滥用相对优势地位的反垄断法规制
发布时间：2018-09-01 09:45
【摘要】：相对优势地位的产生是市场经济的必然现象,主要发生在上下游企业之间特定的垂直交易中,双方本着长期交易下去的目的而产生的相对优势地位现象。相对优势地位与一方企业对交易相对人的依赖程度及该企业是否存在转向其他交易相对人的可能性有关。 当具有相对优势地位的企业滥用该优势地位,破坏竞争,损害消费者利益时,应该受到法律的规制。在法律实践中,滥用相对优势地位的行为一般受民法或者合同法的规制,但是民法或者合同法在契约自由的精神下,往往很难对相对优势地位的滥用行为起到规制作用,在实际操作中也具有很大的局限性。并且,除了民法或者合同法之外,我国并没有统一的关于规制滥用相对优势地位的全国性法律条文,而只是依据各地出台的滥用相对优势地位中某一具体行为的意见或者办法,这就使得被害人或者有关机关在试图寻求法律途径时,变得无法可依,或者只有一部分行为有法可依。 本文拟从相对优势地位的含义入手,通过分析相对优势地位产生的原因,提出了应该由反垄断法进行规制滥用相对优势地位行为的观点；在此基础之上,本文介绍了相对优势地位的理论基础-依赖性理论,并以滥用相对优势地位的经典案例作为支撑依赖性理论的论据；本文还通过分析国外在规制滥用相对优势地位的法律进程,以及我国法律规章对此规定的现状,提出了自己的建议和看法。 本文第一部分论述了相对优势地位的内涵并分析了与相对优势地位有关的其他问题。首先为相对优势地位下了定义；其次阐述了相对优势地位产生的原因,并与绝对优势地位作比较,说明其存在有其特殊性；最后,表明自己的观点,即滥用相对优势地位应该由反垄断法进行规制,并分析了由反垄断法规制的合理性。 本文第二部分论述了相对优势地位的理论基础-依赖性理论。具体论述了依赖性理论的概念及其判断标准即(1)更换交易相对人的可能性；(2)相对人转向其他交易渠道的可替代性；(3)相对人转向其他交易渠道的期待可能性。 本文第三部分引用经典案例论证了滥用相对优势地位发生的主要类型为(1)对品牌产品的依赖；(2)对长期契约的依赖：(3)对必要设施的依赖；(4)供货商对大型零售商的依赖。 本文第四部分论述了我国和国外对滥用相对优势地位的法律规制。首先,介绍并评价了国外对滥用相对优势地位的法律规制；其次,着重分析了我国关于规制滥用相对优势地位的法律现状和不足之处,由此引出下文笔者提出的相关建议。 本文第五部分主要就如何规制滥用相对优势地位提出了法律建议。笔者从滥用相对优势地位的构成要件,法律责任,引入双边市场理论,充分发挥民事诉讼的力量以及行业协会的垂直自律功能等五个层面提出了建议和看法。
[Abstract]:The emergence of comparative advantage status is an inevitable phenomenon of market economy, which mainly occurs in the specific vertical transaction between upstream and downstream enterprises. The relative advantage status is related to the degree of dependence on the relative party and the possibility that the firm can turn to the other relative party. When the enterprises with relative advantage abuse the advantage, destroy the competition and damage the interests of consumers, they should be regulated by law. In legal practice, the abuse of comparative advantage status is generally regulated by civil law or contract law. However, in the spirit of freedom of contract, civil law or contract law is often difficult to regulate the abuse of comparative advantage status. Also has the very big limitation in the actual operation. Moreover, in addition to civil law or contract law, there is no uniform national legal provision on the regulation of abuse of comparative advantage status in China, but only according to the opinions or methods of abusing a specific act of comparative advantage status issued by various localities. This makes it impossible for victims or authorities to seek legal means, or only some acts. This paper intends to start with the meaning of comparative advantage status, through the analysis of the reasons for the emergence of comparative advantage status, put forward the viewpoint that the abuse of comparative advantage status should be regulated by anti-monopoly law, and on this basis, This paper introduces the theoretical basis of relative advantage-dependence theory, and takes the classical case of abuse of relative advantage as the argument to support the dependence theory, and also analyzes the legal process of regulating abuse of relative advantage abroad. As well as our country's laws and regulations to this stipulation present situation, has put forward own suggestion and the opinion. The first part of this paper discusses the connotation of relative advantage and analyzes other problems related to relative advantage. First, it defines the position of relative advantage; secondly, it explains the reasons of the position of relative advantage, and compares it with the position of absolute advantage, which shows that its existence has its particularity; finally, it shows its own viewpoint. That is, abuse of comparative advantage should be regulated by antimonopoly law, and the rationality of regulation by antimonopoly law is analyzed. The second part of this paper discusses the relative advantage position of the theoretical basis-dependence theory. The concept of dependence theory and its criterion are discussed in detail, that is, (1) the possibility of replacing the relative party; (2) the possibility of the relative person turning to other trading channels; (3) the possibility of the counterpart's expectation to turn to other trading channels. In the third part, the main types of abuse of comparative advantage are as follows: (1) dependence on brand products; (2) dependence on long-term contracts; (3) dependence on necessary facilities; (4) dependence of suppliers on large retailers. The fourth part discusses the legal regulation of abuse of comparative advantage in China and abroad. First of all, it introduces and evaluates the foreign legal regulation of abuse of comparative advantage status; secondly, it analyzes the current legal situation and deficiencies of our country on the abuse of comparative advantage status, which leads to the relevant suggestions put forward by the author below. The fifth part of this paper puts forward some legal suggestions on how to regulate the abuse of comparative advantage. The author puts forward some suggestions and opinions from five aspects, such as the constitution of abusing the position of comparative advantage, legal liability, introducing the theory of bilateral market, giving full play to the power of civil action and the vertical self-discipline function of the trade association.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2216816
[Abstract]:The emergence of comparative advantage status is an inevitable phenomenon of market economy, which mainly occurs in the specific vertical transaction between upstream and downstream enterprises. The relative advantage status is related to the degree of dependence on the relative party and the possibility that the firm can turn to the other relative party. When the enterprises with relative advantage abuse the advantage, destroy the competition and damage the interests of consumers, they should be regulated by law. In legal practice, the abuse of comparative advantage status is generally regulated by civil law or contract law. However, in the spirit of freedom of contract, civil law or contract law is often difficult to regulate the abuse of comparative advantage status. Also has the very big limitation in the actual operation. Moreover, in addition to civil law or contract law, there is no uniform national legal provision on the regulation of abuse of comparative advantage status in China, but only according to the opinions or methods of abusing a specific act of comparative advantage status issued by various localities. This makes it impossible for victims or authorities to seek legal means, or only some acts. This paper intends to start with the meaning of comparative advantage status, through the analysis of the reasons for the emergence of comparative advantage status, put forward the viewpoint that the abuse of comparative advantage status should be regulated by anti-monopoly law, and on this basis, This paper introduces the theoretical basis of relative advantage-dependence theory, and takes the classical case of abuse of relative advantage as the argument to support the dependence theory, and also analyzes the legal process of regulating abuse of relative advantage abroad. As well as our country's laws and regulations to this stipulation present situation, has put forward own suggestion and the opinion. The first part of this paper discusses the connotation of relative advantage and analyzes other problems related to relative advantage. First, it defines the position of relative advantage; secondly, it explains the reasons of the position of relative advantage, and compares it with the position of absolute advantage, which shows that its existence has its particularity; finally, it shows its own viewpoint. That is, abuse of comparative advantage should be regulated by antimonopoly law, and the rationality of regulation by antimonopoly law is analyzed. The second part of this paper discusses the relative advantage position of the theoretical basis-dependence theory. The concept of dependence theory and its criterion are discussed in detail, that is, (1) the possibility of replacing the relative party; (2) the possibility of the relative person turning to other trading channels; (3) the possibility of the counterpart's expectation to turn to other trading channels. In the third part, the main types of abuse of comparative advantage are as follows: (1) dependence on brand products; (2) dependence on long-term contracts; (3) dependence on necessary facilities; (4) dependence of suppliers on large retailers. The fourth part discusses the legal regulation of abuse of comparative advantage in China and abroad. First of all, it introduces and evaluates the foreign legal regulation of abuse of comparative advantage status; secondly, it analyzes the current legal situation and deficiencies of our country on the abuse of comparative advantage status, which leads to the relevant suggestions put forward by the author below. The fifth part of this paper puts forward some legal suggestions on how to regulate the abuse of comparative advantage. The author puts forward some suggestions and opinions from five aspects, such as the constitution of abusing the position of comparative advantage, legal liability, introducing the theory of bilateral market, giving full play to the power of civil action and the vertical self-discipline function of the trade association.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 王平;赵亚平;;跨国零售滥用市场优势地位的规制评述[J];北京工商大学学报(社会科学版);2008年06期
2 王亚南;;滥用相对优势地位问题的反垄断法理分析与规制——以大型零售企业收取“通道费”为切入视角[J];法学杂志;2011年05期
3 孟雁北;;滥用相对经济优势地位行为的反垄断法研究[J];法学家;2004年06期
4 曲创;杨超;臧旭恒;;双边市场下大型零售商的竞争策略研究[J];中国工业经济;2009年07期
5 焦海涛;;反垄断法规制相对优势地位的基础与限度[J];时代法学;2008年03期
6 唐茂军;;零售商滥用优势地位法律规制的比较研究——兼论我国竞争立法的完善[J];天水行政学院学报;2008年02期
7 刘彤;;欧美对于拒绝知识产权许可的反垄断审查标准及其对我国的启示[J];学术交流;2009年11期
8 李剑;;论结构性要素在我国《反垄断法》中的基础地位——相对优势地位滥用理论之否定[J];政治与法律;2009年10期
9 王为农;许小凡;;大型零售企业滥用优势地位的反垄断规制问题研究——基于双边市场理论的视角[J];浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年05期
，本文编号：2216816
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2216816.html
