试论合同附随义务的认定及违反合同附随义务的责任

发布时间：2018-11-07 20:54

【摘要】：合同附随义务理论是在德国学说判例中逐步确立的，在我国理论界和实务界中还处于发展与完善阶段，有关合同附随义务的诸多问题在理论界还没有达成共识，还有诸多方面需要学者专家研究的地方。鉴于此，法官在个案中运用合同附随义务理论解决合同纠纷难免出现偏差，尤其是对于合同附随义务的认定问题上。违反合同附随义务应当如何进行救济也需要理论上的完善。本文在已有研究成果的基础之上对合同附随义务的认定和违反合同附随义务的责任进行梳理和阐述，希望对合同附随义务理论的丰富有所帮助。全文共三个部分：第一部分阐述合同附随义务的概念的界定，介绍多位学者对于合同附随义务概念的界定，本文最后采用了台湾地区王泽鉴先生的观点。同时还分别比较了合同附随义务与合同主给付义务、合同从给付义务和不真正义务，从比较中可以更加清楚地认识和把握合同附随义务。第二部分阐述合同附随义务的认定。分析了合同附随义务认定的原则和方法，，具体分析四种基本的合同附随义务的认定。我国《合同法》第六十条第二款明确规定了通知义务、协助义务和保密义务三种附随义务类型，但是因为合同附随义务的不确定性，法律不能穷尽所有的附随义务类型，现实经济交往的多样性和多变性，使得现实中一定会出现法律上没有规定的附随义务类型，所以本部分结合法律规定和现实经济交往，对合同附随义务的认定进行实证分析。第三部分对违反合同附随义务的民事责任进行分析，从违反合同附随义务民事责任的性质、归责原则、构成要件和责任承担方式方面进行分析，这样可以清晰了解违反合同附随义务，受损方应当如何救济。
[Abstract]:The theory of contract collateral obligation is gradually established in the case law of Germany. It is still in the developing and perfecting stage in the theoretical and practical circles of our country. There is no consensus on many issues concerning the contract collateral obligation in the theoretical circle. There are also many areas that need scholars and experts to study. In view of this, it is inevitable for the judge to use the theory of contract collateral obligation to solve contract disputes, especially on the confirmation of contract collateral obligation. How to remedy the breach of contract collateral obligation also needs to be perfected theoretically. Based on the existing research results, this paper combs and expounds the confirmation of contract collateral obligation and the responsibility of breach of contract collateral obligation, hoping to be helpful to the enrichment of the theory of contract collateral obligation. There are three parts in this paper: the first part expounds the definition of contract collateral obligation, introduces the definition of contract collateral obligation by many scholars, and finally adopts the viewpoint of Mr. Wang Zejian from Taiwan. At the same time, it also compares the contract collateral obligation with the contract principal payment obligation, the contract from the pay obligation and the unreal obligation, from the comparison we can understand and grasp the contract collateral obligation more clearly. The second part expounds the confirmation of contract collateral obligation. This paper analyzes the principles and methods of confirming the contract collateral obligation, and concretely analyzes the confirmation of the four basic contract collateral obligations. The second paragraph of Article 60 of the contract Law of China clearly stipulates three types of collateral obligations: the obligation to notify, the obligation to assist and the obligation to keep confidential. However, due to the uncertainty of the collateral obligation of the contract, the law cannot exhaust all the types of collateral obligations. The diversity and variability of the real economic communication make it inevitable that there will be the type of collateral obligation which is not stipulated by law. So this part combines the legal provisions with the actual economic intercourse and makes an empirical analysis on the confirmation of the contract collateral obligation. The third part analyzes the civil liability for breach of the collateral obligation of contract, including the nature of civil liability for breach of contract collateral obligation, the principle of liability imputation, the constitutive elements and the way of liability assumption. This can clearly understand the breach of contract collateral obligations, the injured party should be how to remedy.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】