私人有偿代驾合同性质及责任承担分析
[Abstract]:As a new industry in a new era, substitute driving is becoming more and more popular in this developed traffic society. With the development of driving industry, there are more and more legal problems. The term substitute itself has a very broad meaning. The term substitute in this paper refers to the behavior that the driver provides all the non-operating vehicles, and driving the vehicle on behalf of the driver will be delivered to the designated place by the driver and the vehicle. The substitute contract is an nameless contract, which is not clearly stipulated in the contract Law. From the characteristic point of view, the substitute contract belongs to Nocheng, do not want the form, can be paid or free of charge, nameless contract. For this kind of contract, the academic and judicial practice of our country will usually refer to the similar typical contract to apply, if not, then it boils down to a new nameless contract. At present, the academic circles think that there are three typical contracts which are most similar to the representative contract: employment contract, contract and entrustment contract. Through detailed comparative analysis, we find that the driving contract needs to deliver certain work results, "deliver the motor vehicle and the substitute driver", in the driving process, the surrogate has independent control over the motor vehicle. This undoubtedly coincides with the contract of contract. In our country, the determination of the subject of traffic accident responsibility adopts the criterion of "the dualistic theory of operating dominant operational interests". In the driving behavior, the surrogate has the most direct control over the motor vehicle, and the surrogate obtains his own labor reward and enjoys the running benefits of the motor vehicle through the driving behavior. Therefore, the driver should be the main body of responsibility for traffic accidents because he enjoys both "operation control" and "operation benefit" at the same time.
【学位授予单位】:贵州民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;承揽合同欺诈案件的主要特点[J];工商行政管理;2003年05期
2 金玉松;如何防范承揽合同欺诈[J];农村新技术;2003年01期
3 ;承揽合同方风险自担[J];农家致富;2010年08期
4 ;如何防范承揽合同欺诈[J];家庭科技;2001年12期
5 朱四明;赵歆;;论承揽合同的认定及其司法管辖权的确定[J];法制与经济(上半月);2007年12期
6 张正扬;李德军;;一起承揽合同纠纷案[J];大众用电;2008年09期
7 崔建远;;承揽合同四论[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年02期
8 ;承揽合同就可以随意中止吗[J];中国招标;2011年06期
9 王荣朝;;浅论承揽合同在实务中的区分难点[J];江苏技术师范学院学报;2012年01期
10 张挪亚;;起草承揽合同时的注意事项[J];应用写作;2013年08期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 谢尔强;;承揽合同当事人的责任分析[A];中国合同法论坛论文汇编[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 陈建峰;承揽合同权利义务可否转让[N];人民法院报;2007年
2 赵全能 云南省鲁甸县人民法院;承揽合同的法律特征[N];民主与法制时报;2014年
3 张勤;承揽合同履行地的确定原则[N];江苏经济报;2004年
4 ;承揽合同与建工承包合同的区别[N];中国建设报;2002年
5 席俊 汤金凤;浅议承揽合同关系中的责任承担[N];江苏法制报;2009年
6 胡森宝;建设工程合同与承揽合同之异同[N];江苏经济报;2013年
7 金迎新;搬家合同性质之我见[N];人民法院报;2000年
8 于志宏 袁冶;承揽合同应注意的问题[N];信息时报;2000年
9 章艳艳;谁来为护栏埋单?[N];中国企业报;2007年
10 李霖;买卖、承揽合同的实务辨析[N];江苏法制报;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 丁夕杰;私人有偿代驾合同性质及责任承担分析[D];贵州民族大学;2017年
2 陈晓鹏;雇佣合同与承揽合同的法律适用分析[D];黑龙江大学;2013年
3 单爱明;造船合同法律性质研究[D];大连海事大学;2008年
4 王村;王惠朋伐木受伤案的案例分析[D];兰州大学;2010年
5 柳春雨;雇佣与承揽的合同性质界定及侵权责任承担[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
6 张蕾;唐旺海诉刘强提供劳务者受害责任纠纷案之法律分析[D];兰州大学;2014年
,本文编号:2480085
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/2480085.html