婚生子女否认之诉的研究
发布时间:2018-05-18 03:02
本文选题:婚生子女否认 + 诉讼程序 ; 参考:《西南政法大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:婚生子女否认之诉是亲子诉讼中的一个重要组成部分,此类案件也大量存在于司法实践中。然而我国对其认识并不深刻,《婚姻法》对婚生子女否认之诉也无任何程序规定,我国在历年立法中虽然颁布少量批复和司法解释来对婚生子女否认之诉中的亲子鉴定程序进行规定,但此规定过于片面,且存在漏洞,在司法实务中很难进行操作。笔者以“婚生子女否认之诉的研究”为论题,将民事诉讼法理论贯穿其中,并参照域外关于婚生子女否认之诉的程序规定,对婚生子女否认之诉中管辖、当事人适格、否认权行使的法定事由、亲子鉴定的适用以及诉讼时效进行讨论,最后提出对婚生子女否认之诉的程序构想。本文除引言和结语外,正文分为四个部分,共计27000余字。第一部分是婚生子女否认之诉的概述。主要论述什么是婚生子女否认之诉,以及婚生子女推定的标准,为婚生子女否认之诉提供法理基础。第二部分是婚生子女否认之诉的性质。通过比较确认之诉说和形成之诉说两种不同的学说观点,结合否认权的性质、诉的利益、判决效果这三个因素进行对比分析,最终得出婚生子女否认之诉的性质是形成之诉的结论。第三部分是其他国家及地区关于婚生子女否认之诉的程序规定。笔者通过阐述日本、法国、德国、瑞士及我国台湾地区关于婚生子女否认之诉中婚生子女的推定、当事人适格、否认权行使的法定事由、亲子鉴定的适用以及否认权消灭五个部分的规定,为我国婚生子女否认之诉的程序立法提供了借鉴和方向。第四部分是婚生子女否认之诉的程序构想。从如何明确婚生子女否认之诉的管辖、否认权人的范围、否认权行使的法定事由、亲子鉴定的规定、诉讼时效这五个方面进行论述,为我国未来对婚生子女否认之诉的程序构建提供建议。
[Abstract]:The denials of legitimate children is an important part of parent-child litigation, and a large number of such cases also exist in judicial practice. However, our country does not have a profound understanding of it, and the Marriage Law does not have any procedural provisions on the denials of children born in wedlock. Although our country has issued a small number of written replies and judicial explanations to regulate the paternity identification procedure in the denials of legitimate children, this provision is too one-sided and has loopholes, so it is difficult to operate in judicial practice. Based on the topic of "Research on the denials of legitimate Children", the author makes the theory of civil procedure law run through it, and referring to the procedural provisions of the extra-territorial denials of children born in wedlock, the parties are competent to the jurisdiction in the denials of children born in wedlock. The legal reasons for the exercise of the right of denial, the application of paternity test and the limitation of action are discussed. Finally, the procedural conception of denials of legitimate children is put forward. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four parts, a total of more than 27000 words. The first part is the summary of the denials of legitimate children. This paper mainly discusses what is the denials of children born in wedlock and the standard of presumption of children born in wedlock, which provides a legal basis for denials of children born in wedlock. The second part is the nature of the denials of legitimate children. By comparing the two different theoretical viewpoints of confirmation and formation, combining with the nature of the right of denial, the interests of the lawsuit and the effect of the judgment, the author makes a comparative analysis of these three factors. Finally, it comes to the conclusion that the nature of the denials of legitimate children is the form of litigation. The third part is about other countries and regions about the procedure stipulation that the legitimate child denies the lawsuit. By expounding the presumption of legitimate children in the denials of legitimate children in Japan, France, Germany, Switzerland and Taiwan, the legal reasons for the exercise of the right of denial are presented. The application of paternity test and the elimination of five parts of the right of denial provide a reference and direction for the procedural legislation of denials of legitimate children in China. The fourth part is the procedural conception of the denials of legitimate children. From the following five aspects: how to define the jurisdiction of the denials of legitimate children, the scope of the denial of the right, the legal reasons for the exercise of the right of denial, the provisions of paternity and paternity, and the limitation of action. To provide suggestions for the construction of the procedure of denials of legitimate children in our country in the future.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D923.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 曾令生;谈破产否认权制度[J];政法论丛;1996年05期
2 周代春;;破产法上否认权浅析[J];研究生法学;1996年03期
3 韩长印;刘庆远;;浅析破产法上的否认权[J];法学研究;1993年03期
4 李志强;;亲子关系的推定与否认制度的建构[J];行政与法;2012年12期
5 鲁生;清算组的否认权和破产债权人的抵销权[J];人民司法;1988年01期
6 张燕玲;论人工生殖子女父母身份之认定[J];法学论坛;2005年05期
7 刘成明;;论体内异质授精子女的身份确认[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2006年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 沙银华;债权人能否对变更投保人行使否认权[N];中国保险报;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 严乾;婚生子女推定与否认制度研究[D];辽宁大学;2015年
2 马丽莎;婚生子女否认之诉的研究[D];西南政法大学;2016年
,本文编号:1904063
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/1904063.html