当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 婚姻法论文 >

我国登记程序瑕疵婚姻的法律问题研究

发布时间:2018-06-07 15:47

  本文选题:程序瑕疵 + 撤销婚姻 ; 参考:《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国《婚姻法》规定有效婚姻成立的必经途径是结婚登记,依法办理登记并领取结婚证,合法的夫妻关系正式成立,而不论双方同居或举办仪式与否。随着社会经济快速发展,基于各种动机,呈现出各种情形的婚姻登记程序瑕疵,层出不穷。婚姻登记过程当中会出现各种瑕疵,婚姻效力是不是会受影响,该怎样认定。我国的《婚姻法》司法解释(三)第一条对婚姻登记程序瑕疵处理途径有规定,但是我国法律对此都没有做出明确、可操作性的的规定,仍然存在很多的问题。甚至对于相同或相似案件,可能会出现不同的判决。婚姻登记程序瑕疵,不仅事关婚姻当事人、利益第三人的人身与财产利益,还与司法权威的确定和立法空白的弥补息息相关。因而重视登记程序瑕疵婚姻的法律问题探究,处理好其民事处理途径与行政处理途径至关重要。本文的讨论对象是婚姻登记程序瑕疵的相关的法律问题,主要是围绕着两个问题进行分析阐述的,一是婚姻登记程序瑕疵的解决路径即行政路径与民事路径的抉择;二是瑕疵登记婚姻的法律效力如何认定。亮点在于,通过表格的形式列举出最近司法判决中五个典型案分析出登记程序瑕疵婚姻的效力处理途径的司法现状,剖析婚姻登记程序瑕疵行政途径与民事途径之间路径抉择各自的利弊。分析比较婚姻登记程序瑕疵的处理途径。指出婚姻登记程序瑕疵婚姻效力处理的总体思路,另外,针对婚姻登记程序瑕疵婚姻的几种典型的类型进行分析。针对实际生活中常见的几类典型的婚姻登记程序瑕疵认定:由他人代理办理婚姻登记,认定的要点在于婚姻关系双方是否自愿建立婚姻关系;使用虚伪的证件、证明材料进行婚姻登记;欺诈进行登记结婚;违反管辖规定婚姻登记机关办理婚姻登记。本文提出处理我国婚姻登记程序瑕疵立法完善建议,设立行政违法补正:补正轻微瑕疵的行政行为;确立婚姻成立与不成立之诉:解决实际存在的事实婚姻等难题;建立惩处制度:责罚拥有婚姻登记程序瑕疵过错的责任人即婚姻关系双方和工作人员;建立婚姻公示制度:充分发挥群众婚姻关系的监督作用。
[Abstract]:Our country's Marriage Law stipulates that the necessary way to establish valid marriage is to register the marriage, register and obtain the marriage certificate according to law, and establish the legal relationship between husband and wife, regardless of whether the two parties live together or hold a ceremony or not. With the rapid development of social economy and based on various motives, there are many defects in marriage registration procedure. Marriage registration process will appear a variety of defects, whether the validity of marriage will be affected, how to determine. The Judicial interpretation of the Marriage Law in China (3) Article 1 provides for the ways to deal with defects in marriage registration procedures, but there are still many problems in our country's laws which do not make clear and operable provisions. Even in the same or similar cases, there may be different judgements. The defect of marriage registration procedure is not only related to the personal and property interests of the parties to marriage and the interests of the third party, but also closely related to the determination of judicial authority and the making up of legislative gaps. Therefore, it is very important to pay attention to the legal problems of registration procedure defective marriage and to deal with its civil and administrative approaches. The object of discussion in this paper is the legal problems related to the defects of the marriage registration procedure, which are mainly analyzed and expounded around two problems: the first is the choice of the administrative path and the civil path to resolve the defects of the marriage registration procedure; Second, how to determine the legal effect of defective registration marriage. The bright spot is that, through the form of a table, we list five typical cases in recent judicial decisions and analyze the judicial status quo of the effective ways to deal with the registration procedures for defective marriages. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the path choice between the defective administrative and civil ways of marriage registration procedure. This paper analyzes and compares the ways to deal with the defects of marriage registration procedure. This paper points out the general idea of dealing with the validity of defective marriage in the registration procedure of marriage, and analyzes several typical types of defective marriage in the procedure of registration of marriage. In view of the defects of several typical marriage registration procedures that are common in real life, the main points of the determination are whether or not the marriage relationship is voluntarily established between the two parties to the marriage, the use of false documents, the use of false documents, Registration of marriage by proof materials; registration of marriages by fraud; registration of marriages by marriage registration authorities in violation of jurisdiction. This paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legislation to deal with the defects in the registration procedure of marriage in our country, and establish the administrative illegal correction: to correct the administrative behavior of minor defects, to establish the lawsuit of the establishment and non-establishment of marriage, to solve the problems of actual de facto marriage, and so on. Set up punishment system: punish the person responsible for the fault of marriage registration procedure, that is, both parties to marriage relations and staff; establish marriage publicity system: give full play to the supervision role of mass marriage relationship.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.9

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王淑敏;;婚姻登记现存问题浅析[J];中国民政;2012年12期

2 郭敬波;;不愿“公示”的婚姻[J];检察风云;2012年17期

3 王礼仁;;解决婚姻行政诉讼与民事诉讼“打架”之路径[J];法律适用;2011年02期

4 王礼仁;;“婚姻登记瑕疵”中的婚姻成立与不成立[J];人民司法;2010年11期

5 于晓丽;高云鹏;高功敬;;我国仪式婚的法社会学思考[J];济南大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期

6 谢慧慧;;论婚姻登记的效力[J];法制与社会;2010年10期

7 张迎秀;;结婚登记制度之重构[J];法学杂志;2010年03期

8 胡明玉;;我国登记离婚制度研究[J];法制与社会;2010年02期

9 向红全;高崇惠;;论我国婚姻公示制度[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2008年06期

10 张荣现;李芳艳;;仪式婚的若干法律问题思考[J];华北水利水电学院学报(社科版);2008年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 郭敬波;;隐婚与婚姻公示制度[N];人民法院报;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 李雪竹;我国婚姻登记瑕疵问题研究[D];山西大学;2015年

2 朱天娣;婚姻登记瑕疵问题的法律探析[D];郑州大学;2013年

3 申蒂;婚姻登记程序瑕疵的效力与救济问题研究[D];广西大学;2013年

4 张振英;婚姻登记瑕疵纠纷的解决路径研究[D];内蒙古大学;2012年

5 朱海文;瑕疵婚姻登记的法律效力探究[D];中国政法大学;2010年



本文编号:1991720

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/1991720.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fbd82***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com