跨国商业贿赂域外管辖权的法律研究

发布时间：2018-01-14 16:00

本文关键词：跨国商业贿赂域外管辖权的法律研究　出处：《贵州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着跨国商业贿赂案件频发,各国加强了规制跨国商业贿赂的立法,如美国的《反海外贿赂法》等。因为跨国商业贿赂具有涉外的特点,存在多种管辖原则,各个国家和国际组织对这些管辖原则的法律规定内容不完全相同,解释的也存在差异,甚至对某些内容不认可,这就引起了各国间管辖矛盾。为了解决这些矛盾,各国或国际组织纷纷出台了相关法律法规。随着我国日益强大,愈来愈多的大型公司走出国门,也有越来越多的外国公司扎根中国,加强对这些法律法规的研究,有重大的理论意义、现实意义和实践意义。本文在阐述跨国商业贿赂域外管辖理论的基础上,运用案例研究方法,以辉瑞案和葛兰素史克案为研究对象,充分阐述管辖原则和管辖冲突协调原则,结合我国立法现状,总结出完善我国跨国商业贿赂域外管辖权各项原则与协调域外管辖权冲突原则的法律对策。本文共分为三个部分:第一章主要论述了商业贿赂基本理论以及管辖权的相关理论。第二章主要结合案例评析国外关于商业贿赂域外管辖方面的法律。这是本章的重点,通过比较可知,对于域外贿赂犯罪,英国法比美国法规制更加严厉,但都具有域外效力。第三章通过分析我国关于域外管辖权的立法现状,指出域外管辖原则需要改进的地方,进而总结出完善我国跨国商业贿赂域外管辖权各项原则与协调域外管辖权冲突原则的法律对策。
[Abstract]:With the frequent occurrence of transnational commercial bribery cases, various countries have strengthened their legislation to regulate transnational commercial bribery, such as the Anti-overseas bribery Act of the United States, etc. Because transnational commercial bribery has the characteristics of foreign affairs, there are many jurisdictional principles. The legal provisions of the various States and international organizations on these principles of jurisdiction are not identical in content, in different interpretations, or even in respect of certain elements. In order to solve these contradictions, countries or international organizations have issued relevant laws and regulations. With the growing strength of our country, more and more large companies go abroad. There are more and more foreign companies rooted in China, strengthen the study of these laws and regulations, has great theoretical significance, practical significance and practical significance. With the Pfizer case and GlaxoSmithKline case as the object of study, this paper fully expounds the principle of jurisdiction and the principle of coordination of jurisdiction conflict, combined with the current situation of legislation in China. This paper summarizes the legal countermeasures of perfecting the principles of extraterritorial jurisdiction of transnational commercial bribery and coordinating the principle of conflict of extraterritorial jurisdiction. The first chapter mainly discusses the basic theory of commercial bribery and related theories of jurisdiction. The second chapter mainly analyzes the foreign laws on the extraterritorial jurisdiction of commercial bribery in combination with cases. This is the focus of this chapter. Through comparison, we can know that the British law is more severe than the United States, but has extraterritorial effect. Chapter three analyzes the status of legislation on extraterritorial jurisdiction in China. The author points out that the principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction needs to be improved, and sums up the legal countermeasures to perfect the principles of extraterritorial jurisdiction of transnational commercial bribery and to coordinate the principle of conflict of extraterritorial jurisdiction in China.
【学位授予单位】：贵州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】