论生产者的产品后续安全保障义务

发布时间：2018-01-30 05:51

本文关键词： 交易安全义务警示召回请求权基础　出处：《法学》2015年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为交易安全义务的重要内容,产品后续安全保障义务是指在产品使用或消费过程中,生产者负有的在产品出现危险迹象或者危险已经产生时,以适当的方式进行干预,防止危险转化为现实损害的义务。产品后续安全保障义务不同于合同法中的瑕疵担保义务和附随义务,它是一种脱离合同权利义务关系的非合同义务。依据产品具体危险的性质,对作为生产者履行产品后续安全保障义务主要措施的警示和召回应予以区别适用,以期充分发挥这两种措施的损害预防功能,同时实现市场交易主体之间的利益平衡。赋予受害人于损害未发生时请求生产者采取措施以消除产品危险的权利,可提高生产者责任救济的主动性和预防性,从而强化侵权责任法的损害预防功能。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the transaction security obligation, the following product security obligation refers to the producer's responsibility in the process of product use or consumption, when the product is in danger or danger has already appeared. The obligation to prevent the danger from being transformed into actual damage is different from the obligation to guarantee defects and collateral obligations in contract law. It is a kind of non-contractual obligation which is divorced from the contract rights and obligations. According to the nature of the product's specific danger, the warning and recall, which are the main measures for the producer to fulfill the product's subsequent safety and security obligations, should be applied differently. The purpose of this paper is to give full play to the damage prevention function of these two measures, and to realize the balance of interests among the market trading subjects, and to give the victim the right to request the producer to take measures to eliminate the danger of the product when the damage has not occurred. It can enhance the initiative and prevention of producer responsibility relief and strengthen the damage prevention function of tort liability law.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心;
【分类号】：D922.294;D923
【正文快照】： 传统的产品责任源于生产者对自身提供产品之前注意义务的违背,随着产品责任理论和实践的发展,生产者的注意义务巳从提供产品之前延伸至提供产品之后。生产者的注意义务并不随着产品的交付与流通而终结,生产者还应继续关注产品的使用,并在产品出现危险的迹象或者这种危险已实际

【参考文献】