论农地信托中信托人介入权及其实现

发布时间：2018-03-23 22:38

本文选题：农村土地信托　切入点：农地信托　出处：《华中科技大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：作为一种将信托机制、金融机构与现代农业结合起来的新型设计,农地信托具有与生俱来的灵活性,但英美相对所有权信托制度融入大陆法系和我国物权体系却产生一系列的难题,表现之一就是信托人的权利过大,对信托协议或合同的介入也更多的体现其对信托的实际控制,而非“监督者”的法律定位。本文围绕农村土地信托中信托人的介入权问题,从介入权的发生依据入手,分析了其权利性质及权利限制,并从制度保障的层面提出了权利实现的建议,主要做了如下几个方面的工作:首先,关于信托人权利的发生依据。以对国内外有关研究资料进行阅读分析为前提,分别梳理了对英美法系相对所有权理论下信托人权利的债权基础、大陆法系绝对所有权观念下信托人权利的物权基础,并分析了我国以绝对化的物权为前提创新性地赋予信托人一系列扩大权利的法理、制度和实践基础。其次,关于信托人介入权的权利性质。从农地信托人介入权的权利定位入手,分析了信托人、受托人、受益人及合同第三人的权利义务,并分别阐述了介入权在信托协议以及受托人与第三人所订立的合同中的适用范围。再次,关于信托人介入权的权利限制,指出信托人通过否决、撤销、变更受益人或处分受益人受益权、解除、认可、裁决等方式,可直接或间接对信托进行控制,在信托设立之后仍然凌驾于信托、受益人甚至受托人之上,有必要以介入权予以限制,并设置相应的责任监督机制。最后,关于介入权的权利实现,提出由于信托人的现有法律地位,介入权的不当行使会产生信托人权利扩张、受托人意志不自由、受益人利益受损、信托财产独立性丧失以及信托的分离性设计受制约等法律效果,因此有必要从信托人法律地位的转变、受托人忠实义务的完善、信托财产的登记公示制度、信托刺破和监察人制度的建立等方面完善相应的配套制度。
[Abstract]:As a kind of trust mechanism, a new design of financial institutions and the combination of modern agriculture. The agricultural land trust has the flexibility inherent, but relatively common ownership of the trust system into civil law and China's property right system has produced a series of problems, the performance is one of the trustee rights is too large, the trust agreement or contract the intervention is also more reflected the actual control of the trust, rather than the legal position of the supervisor ". The problem of intervention right around rural land trust CITIC trustee, starting from the occurrence according to the right to intervene, analyzes the nature of rights and restriction of rights, and suggestions are put forward from the aspects of the realization of the rights protection system. The main work as follows: firstly, on the basis of human rights trust occurred. Based on the related studies at home and abroad to read data analysis as the premise, were combed in Britain The relative rights of ownership claims based trust under the theory of American law, property rights based trust under the concept of absolute ownership in continental law system, and analyzes our country to absolute property is the premise of innovation to trust people in a series of expanding the rights of law theory, system and practice. Secondly, on the nature of the right of trustee the right to intervene. Right positioning from the land trust the right to intervene with the analysis of the trustee, the trustee, the beneficiary and the third party of the contract rights and obligations, the applicable scope and expound the right to intervene in the trust agreement, the trustee and the third person contract in. Again, on the right to limit the trust of people involved right, the author points out that trust by veto, revocation, change the beneficiary or dispose of beneficiary right, rescission, recognition, ruling way, directly or indirectly, to the trust of the control, in the establishment of trust after Still superior to the trust, the trustee or beneficiary, it is necessary to restrict the right to intervene, and set the corresponding responsibility supervision mechanism. Finally, on the right of intervention rights, put forward due to the existing legal status of trust people, improper exercise of the right of intervention will produce trustees expansion of rights, the trustee will not free, the beneficiary damage to the interests of the independence of the trust property loss and separation design Trust Limited legal effect, so it is necessary to change the legal status of trust from the people, improve the trustee's duty of loyalty to the trust property registration and publicity system, perfect the corresponding system based on trust and pierce the supervisor system.

【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.282

【相似文献】