有限责任公司股东退股权法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-29 10:01

本文选题：有限责任公司　切入点：股东　出处：《贵州大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文通过2013年北京市一中院二审审结的“上诉人刘某某与被上诉人北京市新路运输有限公司请求公司收购股份纠纷一案”的判决说明了当前研究有限责任公司股东退股权仍具有现实意义,从而引出论题《有限责任公司股东退股权法律问题研究》。本文除引言和结语外,共分为四个部分。第一部分,笔者首先通过对国内外关于退股权含义的观点进行总结,提出了自己对于退股权的定义。之后将退股权与相近概念进行比较,使退股权含义更加明晰。之后,对有限责任公司股东退股权的理论基础进行了叙述。第一部分为全文的理论基础。第二部分,通过对大陆法系国家代表德国有限公司股东退股权和英美法系国家代表美国封闭公司的股东退股权在主体、适用条件、程序等方面的总结、对比,得出德国在退股权的权利主体和适用条件上规定的比较完善,而美国在退股权的行使程序和估价规则上规定的比较详备。进而可知,我国的有限公司股东退股权可在实体规则方面借鉴德国规定,在程序方面借鉴美国规定。第三部分,笔者通过对我国现行有限责任公司股东退股权制度进行总结,详细的指出了我国现行制度存在制度不成体系、权利主体范围过窄、适用范围过于局限等不足,从而使第四部分提出完善建议有了相对性。第四部分,针对我国有限责任公司股东退股权制度存在的不足,在借鉴德美两国相关制度的基础上,笔者从基本原则、实体规则、程序规则三方面对我国有限责任公司股东退股权制度提出了详尽的完善建议,这部分也是本文的重中之重和亮点部分。结语部分,笔者对全文进行了梳理、总结,重申了本文的观点。
[Abstract]:Through the judgment of "appellant Liu Xi-mou and appellee Beijing New Road Transportation Co., Ltd., requesting the company to buy shares", which was concluded in the second instance of the first Middle Court of Beijing in 2013, this article explains the current research limited liability company stock. Eastward withdrawal of equity is still of practical significance. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part, the author summarizes the domestic and foreign views on the meaning of withdrawal. The author puts forward his own definition of withdrawing equity, and compares the withdrawal of equity with similar concepts to make the meaning of withdrawal more clear. This paper describes the theoretical basis of shareholders' withdrawal of equity in a limited liability company. The first part is the theoretical basis of the full text. The second part, Through the summary of the withdrawal of shareholders' equity in the continental law countries on behalf of the German limited company and the withdrawal of the shareholders of the Anglo-American law system countries on behalf of the closed companies in the United States in the aspects of subject, applicable conditions, procedures, and so on, a comparison is made. The conclusion is that Germany has perfect provisions on the subject of the right and the applicable conditions, while the United States has more detailed provisions on the procedure for the exercise of the withdrawal of shares and the rules of valuation. In the third part, the author summarizes the current shareholder withdrawal system of limited liability company in our country, which can be used for reference in the substantive rules of Germany and the United States in the aspect of procedure. It points out in detail that the current system of our country is not systematic, the scope of the subject of right is too narrow, the scope of application is too limited, and so on. In view of the deficiency of shareholder withdrawal system of limited liability company in our country, on the basis of drawing lessons from the relevant systems of Germany and the United States, the author from the basic principles, substantive rules, Three aspects of the procedural rules of China's limited liability company shareholders to withdraw equity system made detailed suggestions, this part is also the most important and highlight part of this article. Conclusion part, the author of the full text is combed, summarized, The point of view of this paper is reiterated.
【学位授予单位】：贵州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】