公共道路管理瑕疵致害责任案件疑难问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-23 07:32

本文选题：公共道路管理瑕疵致害责任 + 行政处罚权相对集中　；参考：《法律适用》2015年10期

【摘要】：我国公共道路管理瑕疵致害责任性质上属于民事赔偿责任。案件审理中甄别道路管理者应考虑道路性质、公路等级、瑕疵性质、部门设置等多方面,在行政处罚权相对集中情形下应根据瑕疵所对应的管理职能履行主体确定。适用普通注意义务标准作为道路管理是否存在瑕疵的判断标准,同时兼顾督促管理勤勉与防止加重负担原则。在无直接证据的条件下,认定因果关系应发挥一定的司法能动性,结合间接证据、生活常识、逻辑推断等作出综合性判断。除法律有明确规定之外,道路管理者与其他侵权人之间的共同责任形态适用按份责任为宜,道路管理者承担责任后不宜享有追偿权。
[Abstract]:The nature of the liability for damages caused by defects in public road management in China belongs to civil liability for compensation. The road manager should consider the nature of the road, the grade of the highway, the nature of the defect, the setting of the department and so on. In the case of relatively centralized administrative penalty power, the administrative authority should be determined according to the corresponding administrative function. The standard of common duty of care should be applied as the judgment standard of whether there are defects in road management, and the principle of supervision and management diligence and prevention of increasing burden should be taken into account at the same time. Under the condition of no direct evidence, the conclusion that causality should play a certain judicial active role, combined with indirect evidence, common sense of life, logic inference and so on to make a comprehensive judgment. In addition to the clear provisions of the law, the form of joint responsibility between the road manager and other infringers is appropriate, and the road manager should not enjoy the right of recourse after assuming the responsibility.
【作者单位】：上海市浦东新区人民法院;
【分类号】：D922.296

【相似文献】