经济体特性与反垄断法的界限——以澳门博彩业为视角

发布时间：2018-05-15 03:06

本文选题：小经济体 + 反垄断法　；参考：《法学》2015年02期

【摘要】：美国和欧盟的反垄断法体系虽是其他国家和地区学习之模板,但也产生了反垄断法制度是否适合所有规模经济体情况的问题。从经济学理论上说,小经济体因为更容易受到规模经济的影响,故需要在反垄断法的并购控制、市场支配地位滥用等方面进行制度调整。但是,小经济体本身的多样性和现实状况的复杂性却对反垄断法本身是否应当得到适用这一前提提出了挑战。在澳门这样一个开放型的小经济体中,尽管引入竞争促使其博彩业得以快速发展,消解了之前市场的垄断格局,但外部需求的持续增长使得博彩业不断扩张,吸引了包括劳动力、土地在内的稀缺资源进入到博彩业中,导致产业单一化问题恶化,严重威胁到澳门经济的安全。对此情况,反垄断法理论体系往往只考虑到开放竞争对于产业内垄断的抑制,而对产业间资源分配所导致的结果却没有考虑,使得反垄断法制度本身并不能处理由此所产生的经济安全问题。在反垄断法与其他社会政策发生冲突时,对经济安全的确保具有基础性作用,必然会排斥反垄断法的适用。
[Abstract]:Although the anti-monopoly law system of the United States and the European Union is a model for other countries and regions to learn, it also raises the question of whether the anti-monopoly law system is suitable for all economies. From the economic theory, because small economies are more vulnerable to the impact of economies of scale, it is necessary to adjust the system in the aspects of merger and acquisition control of anti-monopoly law, abuse of market dominant position, and so on. But the diversity of small economies and the complexity of reality challenge the premise that antitrust law itself should be applied. In a small open economy like Macao, although the introduction of competition has led to the rapid development of its gambling industry and eliminated the monopoly of the previous market, the continued growth of external demand has led to the constant expansion of the gambling industry. It has attracted scarce resources, including labor and land, into the gambling industry, exacerbating the problem of unifying the industry and seriously threatening the security of Macao's economy. In this case, the theoretical system of anti-monopoly law usually only considers the inhibition of open competition to intra-industry monopoly, but not the result of inter-industry resource allocation. This makes the anti-monopoly law itself not able to deal with the economic security problems arising therefrom. When the anti-monopoly law conflicts with other social policies, it plays a fundamental role in ensuring the economic security, and it will inevitably exclude the application of the anti-monopoly law.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学凯原法学院;
【分类号】：D912.29

【参考文献】