公司实际破产时董事对一般债权人的义务研究
发布时间：2018-08-11 21:20
【摘要】：公司实际破产时一般债权人利益往往受到侵害,法律课以董事对一般债权人的义务是解决该问题的重要方式之一。西方国家法律对此有所规定。初步看来,我国法律亦有相关规定。但是,进一步分析表明,这些规定并没有明确公司实际破产时董事的相关义务,也没有真正起到保护一般债权人和维护债权人公平清偿原则的作用。故在比较法研究的基础上,笔者建议,我国应对相关法律进行改革,明确规定公司实际破产时董事应承担保护一般债权人利益的义务,并完善对债权人的救济、在公司实际破产时引进债权人代表诉讼制度。
[Abstract]:The interests of the general creditors are often infringed when the company is actually bankrupt. The obligation of the directors to the general creditors is one of the important ways to solve this problem. Western laws provide for this. The preliminary view, our country law also has the correlation stipulation. However, further analysis shows that these provisions do not clarify the relevant obligations of directors at the time of the actual bankruptcy of the company, nor do they really play a role in protecting general creditors and safeguarding the principle of fair discharge of creditors. Therefore, on the basis of comparative law research, the author suggests that our country should reform the relevant laws and make it clear that the directors should assume the obligation to protect the interests of the general creditors and perfect the relief to the creditors when the company actually goes bankrupt. In the actual bankruptcy of the company the introduction of creditor representative litigation system.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“公司董事对债权人责任的法律制度研究”(项目编号:10CFX069)的研究成果
【分类号】：D922.291.92
[Abstract]:The interests of the general creditors are often infringed when the company is actually bankrupt. The obligation of the directors to the general creditors is one of the important ways to solve this problem. Western laws provide for this. The preliminary view, our country law also has the correlation stipulation. However, further analysis shows that these provisions do not clarify the relevant obligations of directors at the time of the actual bankruptcy of the company, nor do they really play a role in protecting general creditors and safeguarding the principle of fair discharge of creditors. Therefore, on the basis of comparative law research, the author suggests that our country should reform the relevant laws and make it clear that the directors should assume the obligation to protect the interests of the general creditors and perfect the relief to the creditors when the company actually goes bankrupt. In the actual bankruptcy of the company the introduction of creditor representative litigation system.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“公司董事对债权人责任的法律制度研究”(项目编号:10CFX069)的研究成果
【分类号】：D922.291.92
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 魏改莲,王军宏;完善我国独立董事法律制度研究[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2002年04期
2 徐进;我国董事责任保险的现状分析[J];广西经济管理干部学院学报;2004年04期
3 朱丰慧;论我国董事责任保险存在的问题及完善[J];中共南昌市委党校学报;2004年04期
4 路广;论独立董事的独立性[J];韶关学院学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
5 张昊;李震东;;论董事责任的豁免机制[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
6 董昱;;浅论董事责任保险及其在我国的发展[J];法制与社会;2006年15期
7 李云伍;;浅议公司董事责任保险问题[J];知识经济;2011年05期
8 王洪强;;论我国董事责任的限制与免除[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2012年04期
9 谢亚婷;;浅议公司董事的责任[J];环渤海经济w，
本文编号：2178267
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2178267.html
