反垄断法宽恕制度的中国实践及理论反思

发布时间：2019-05-24 14:22

【摘要】：随着反垄断执法逐渐增多,宽恕制度在中国得到更多应用,在浙江保险业案、日本车企垄断案等案中均有体现。日益丰富的案例素材提供了立足中国实践反思现行制度的契机。一方面,由于实体和程序规则的缺失,现行法上的宽恕制度实效有限,实践适用不一;另一方面,现行法及其实践存在鲜明特色。在适用范围上,我国宽恕制度可以适用于固定转售价格等纵向垄断协议,虽然多数国家仅将其适用于横向卡特尔。基于我国立法及其实施情况,此种宽泛适用在现阶段不违背制度原理,具有阶段合理性。在宽恕待遇上,我国现行法规定价格垄断违法行为的第二个申请者可以减轻不低于50%的责任,这种仅设定减轻幅度下限的梯度责任设计会破坏宽恕制度的竞赛机制,减损实效。
[Abstract]:With the gradual increase of anti-monopoly law enforcement, forgiveness system has been more widely used in China, which is reflected in Zhejiang insurance case, Japanese car-enterprise monopoly case and so on. The increasingly rich case material provides an opportunity to reflect on the current system based on Chinese practice. On the one hand, due to the lack of substantive and procedural rules, the effect of the forgiveness system in the current law is limited and the practical application is different; on the other hand, the existing law and its practice have distinct characteristics. In terms of scope of application, the forgiveness system in China can be applied to vertical monopoly agreements such as fixed resale prices, although most countries only apply it to horizontal cartels. Based on the legislation and its implementation in our country, this kind of broad application does not violate the system principle at the present stage, and has the stage rationality. In terms of forgiveness treatment, the current law of our country stipulates that the second applicant who violates the law of price monopoly can reduce the liability by not less than 50%. This gradient liability design, which only sets the lower limit of reduction, will destroy the competition mechanism of the forgiveness system. Derogate from the actual effect.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【基金】：江苏省2014年度普通高校研究生科研创新计划(项目编号:KYLX_0009)资助
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】