雇主歧视性报复法律规制研究

发布时间：2018-02-20 14:38

本文关键词： 雇主歧视性报复雇员行为雇主行为因果关系救济　出处：《上海交通大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 雇主因为雇员反对雇主违法行为或者指控、作证、协助、以任何方式参与《民权法案》所规定的调查、诉讼、听证等参加行为而对其实施不利行为的,构成歧视性报复,以《民权法案》为代表,雇主歧视性报复在美国有着完整的法律规制体系。其保护范围包括前雇员在内的所有雇员,当其因为反对雇主的违法行为或参加法律规定的调查、诉讼、听证行为而受到雇主歧视性报复时,将会得到来自如EEOC等行政组织的全面保护以及在司法程序中的侧重保护,尤其是举证责任的分配。雇员如果能证明其主张成立,可以要求复职,获得赔偿金、诉讼费用等。雇主歧视性报复案件在我国亦普遍存在,但在立法上没有明确规定其性质,现行行政处理模式忽视了雇员的权利,司法救济制度不健全,完全采用民事诉讼程序处理事实上不平等主体间的纠纷。由此造成对雇员平等权和劳动权的侵犯。我们可以在法律中将其明确为独立歧视;明确雇员检举、控告雇主违法行为或者为他人作证、主张权利等行为受法律保护;无正当理由的雇主行为是法律禁止的雇主报复。在法律空白期可以援引宪法的平等权和劳动权来解决此类纠纷。
[Abstract]:The employer because of their illegal acts or charges against the employer, to assist in the investigation, ", stipulated in the bill of rights" in any way to participate in the hearing proceedings, and on the implementation of negative behaviors, a discriminatory retaliation to the civil rights act as the representative of < >, employer discrimination retaliation has a complete system of legal regulation in the United States. The scope of protection of all employees including former employees, because when the investigation, illegal acts against the employer or in legal proceedings, the hearings by the employer discrimination retaliation, will be fully protected from EEOC such as administrative organization and in judicial proceedings focus on protection, especially the allocation of the burden of proof. If the employee can prove that the master Zhang founded, can request reinstatement, get compensation, the cost of litigation.
Employer discrimination retaliation cases also exist in our country, but the legislation does not specify the nature of the current administrative processing model ignores the rights of employees, the judicial relief system is not perfect, complete with the civil procedure inequality in fact disputes among the subjects. The resulting violations of employees equal rights and labor rights we can. In law, it clearly is independent of discrimination; clear employees report, accused of illegal acts or the employer for others to claim such acts are protected by law; the employer justification is prohibited by law in the legal blank period of revenge. The employer can invoke the constitutional equality rights and labor rights to resolve such disputes.

【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D922.5

【参考文献】