完善我国知识产权侵权诉讼域外管辖权的若干思考

发布时间：2017-12-26 23:16

本文关键词：完善我国知识产权侵权诉讼域外管辖权的若干思考　出处：《科技与法律》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国对涉外知识产权侵权案件的管辖遵循地域性管辖原则,但该原则在实践中日益显示出其弊端,导致我国法院在管辖权行使问题上缺乏弹性应对能力,不利于增强我国在国际竞争中的知识产权竞争力。建设创新型国家要求我国法院借鉴美国等国家做法,适度扩张对涉外知识产权案件的管辖权。本文尝试提出我国法院在审理不同类型涉外知识产权案件时突破地域性管辖的司法管辖规则,并对"平行诉讼"及"不方便法院原则"的司法适用进行了探讨。
[Abstract]:Under the jurisdiction of China on foreign-related IPR infringement cases follow the territorial jurisdiction principle, but this principle in practice has increasingly shown its drawbacks, resulting in China's court jurisdiction on the lack of flexibility coping ability, is not conducive to enhancing the competitiveness of our country in the international competition of intellectual property rights. The construction of an innovative country requires that the court of our country draw on the national practices of the United States and other countries to appropriately expand the jurisdiction of the cases of intellectual property rights involved in foreign affairs. This paper attempts to put forward the judicial rules of Chinese courts to break through territorial jurisdiction when trying different types of intellectual property cases, and discuss the judicial application of "parallel litigation" and "forum non convenience" principle.
【作者单位】：北京知识产权法院审判二庭;
【基金】：最高人民法院2015年度审判理论重大课题《涉国际竞争知识产权司法保护问题研究》的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1;D923.4
【正文快照】： 目次一、我国关于涉外知识产权侵权案件管辖的相关规定664(一)知识产权的地域性特点664(二)我国对涉外知识产权侵权案件实现严格地域性管辖原则664二、严格遵循地域性管辖原则的弊端665(一)不利于我国法院管辖发生于境外的“侵权”行为665(二)不利于我国法院管辖互联网等新技

【相似文献】