深度链接行为的法律定性研究

发布时间：2017-12-27 11:35

本文关键词：深度链接行为的法律定性研究　出处：《华东政法大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：深度链接由于改变了传统链接对作品的呈现方式,从而影响了网络环境中基于作品传播产生的利益的分配,并由此在实践中引发了链接服提供商与授权传播渠道等相关市场主体之间的利益纠纷。而我国《著作权法》及相关法律法规在规定“信息网络传播权”时,并未对受“信息网络传播权”控制的传播行为进行明确界定,致使理论与实务界关于信息网络传播行为的判断标准产生诸多争议。而关于深度链接中设链行为的法律定性,就是争议焦点之一。因此,本文力争在现有的著作权法框架内,就深度链接行为的性质进行法律分析。并在此基础上,就深度链接可能涉及的侵权情形,逐一分析设链者的责任承担问题。第一章首先指出目前深度链接行为在实务与理论中存在的争议。一是司法审判标准不统一。对于同类的深度链接行为,各个法院之间的认定标准与裁判结果互相矛盾、冲突。二是学术研究观点存在分歧。对于深度链接能否构成受信息网络传播权控制的传播行为,学者之间持有不同观点和理由。司法实践与理论研究相互作用、相互影响,导致深度链接行为的定性问题一直悬而未决。第二章对深度链接行为的性质进行分析。在对著作权法意义上的传播行为进行明确界定后,将深度链接行为与“交互式传播行为”、网络环境中的“非交互式传播行为”进行比较,得出结论:深度链接行为不构成著作权法意义上的传播行为,不可能受到著作权专有权的控制。第三章针对深度链接行为可能涉及的不同侵权情形,分析设链主体的责任承担问题。深度链接行为本身不属于网络传播行为,因而不可能构成著作权直接侵权。但深度链接行为会扩大作品的传播范围,设链者在明知或应知被链作品侵权的情况下仍然为侵权作品的传播提供链接服务的,会构成对权利人专有权利的间接侵害。此外,对于其他利用深度链接实施的侵权行为,在受不到著作权法规制的情况下,应借助于民事侵权责任法和反正当竞争法进行规制,从而对相关利益主体的合法权益进行保护。
[Abstract]:Deep links due to the change of the traditional link to the presentation of the work, thus affecting the distribution based on the dissemination of works in the network environment of interest, and thus in practice caused a conflict of interests between link service providers and authorized dissemination channels and other related market. China's "copyright law" and relevant laws and regulations stipulated in the "information network transmission right", not on the propagation behavior by the "information network transmission right" control were clearly defined, resulting in theory and Practice on the information network communication behavior criterion has a lot of controversy. The legal nature of chain behavior in deep links is one of the focus of controversy. Therefore, this article tries to make a legal analysis on the nature of the deep link behavior in the framework of the existing copyright law. On this basis, this paper analyzes the liability of the chain - makers on one by one with regard to the possible torts that may be involved in the deep link. The first chapter first points out the existing disputes in the practice and theory of deep link behavior. First, the standard of judicial trial is not unified. For the same kind of deep linking behavior, the criteria for identification between the various courts contradict and conflict with the results of the referees. The two is that there are differences in academic research. There are different views and reasons among scholars for whether deep links can constitute the transmission of the right to control the communication right of information network. The interaction and mutual influence of judicial practice and theoretical research have led to the uncertainty of the qualitative problem of deep linking behavior. The second chapter analyzes the nature of the deep link behavior. The propagation behavior in the copyright law are clearly defined, the deep linking behavior and interactive communication behavior in the network environment "," non interactive communication behavior "comparison, concluded that deep linking behavior does not constitute the propagation behavior of the copyright law, control may not have been the exclusive right of copyright the. The third chapter analyzes the issue of the responsibility of the main body of the chain in view of the different torts that may be involved in the deep link behavior. The behavior of deep link does not belong to the network communication behavior, so it can not constitute the direct copyright infringement. However, the deep link behavior will expand the scope of the work, and the chain members still provide link services for the transmission of infringing works when they know or should be aware of the infringement of the chain works, which will constitute indirect infringement on the exclusive rights of the obligee. Besides, for other infringements which are implemented by deep links, under the condition that copyright law is not regulated, we should rely on tort liability law and regulate the competition law anyway, so as to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the relevant stakeholders.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】