论我国复制权的保护范围的扩大

发布时间：2018-01-06 08:11

本文关键词：论我国复制权的保护范围的扩大　出处：《吉林大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

更多相关文章： 复制权 临时复制 异体复制 著作权

【摘要】：复制权作为著作权的核心权利,在科技不断进步的今天有着十分重要的地位。保护好和调整好这项权利,涉及到经济利益和社会利益等诸多方面。从现有的著作权法来看,复制权的保护存在着一定的滞后性和保守性。复制权保护范围过窄会挫伤创作者的积极性,不利于文化创新;但如果复制权保护范围过宽,则不利于作品的传播和利用,损害社会公众利益。新技术条件下,某种复制行为能否纳入复制权的保护范围,需要在结合复制权的本质特征的基础上做出价值判断,本文着重从临时复制和异体复制两个方面讨论复制权的保护范围在《著作权法》修订过程中应如何规制。本文采用比较研究法、案例分析法等方法,对我国复制权保护范围进行分析,本文分为引言、正文以及结论三大部分,其中正文又由三部分组成,分别介绍了我国复制权保护范围应予扩大的现实需求、我国复制权保护范围扩大的表现及原因分析、我国复制权保护范围扩大的制度跟进。本文引言介绍了我国传统的复制权的保护范围及新技术条件下出现的新的表现形式,结合《著作权法》的第三次修改,提出相关问题而引出正文部分。第一部分为复制权保护范围应予扩大的现实需求。介绍了复制权的概念、发展历程及核心特征,分析了现行《著作权法》中复制权规定的滞后性。并着重阐述了复制权保护范围应予扩大的必要性,从《著作权法》的立法宗旨、法的规范作用、对外贸易发展等角度进行了论述,并简单介绍了我国已经加入的与版权相关的国际条约,阐明了相关责任和义务;本文的第二部分是全文的核心内容,重点就复制权保护范围扩大的表现及原因进行了分析。通过介绍腾讯公司诉王友金、淘宝公司著作权纠纷案,腾讯公司诉光阳电器公司、济南银座集团著作权纠纷案及相关法律评析,分析临时复制和异体复制的本质内容及在案例中的具体表现。并从多个角度阐述临时复制和异体复制纳入复制权保护范围的必要性,包括其本质特征、国际立法趋势及可操作性和执行性等,进而得出复制权的保护范围应予扩大的结论。这既顺应国际法律发展趋势,又能有效保护创作者的积极性,促进文化领域的创新;第三部分为我国复制权保护范围扩大的制度跟进,介绍了《著作权法》第三次修改过程中复制权概念的扩大并提出修改建议。同时阐明任何权利都不是绝对的,在扩大复制权保护范围的同时应完善复制权的限制制度,如合理使用、法定许可等。并简单介绍了合理使用和法定许可制度的基本内容及其在各国家的法律规定。同时阐述了我国现行《著作权法》中合理使用和法定许可的相关规定,分析其不足之处,以抛砖引玉,不断完善我国复制权的权利限制体系。
[Abstract]:As the core right of copyright, the right of reproduction has a very important position in the continuous progress of science and technology today. From the point of view of the existing copyright law, there is a lag and conservatism in the protection of the right of reproduction. The narrow scope of the protection of the right of reproduction will dampen the enthusiasm of the creators. Not conducive to cultural innovation; However, if the scope of protection of reproduction right is too wide, it is not conducive to the dissemination and use of works, harm the public interests. Under the new technology conditions, a certain reproduction behavior can be included in the scope of protection of reproduction rights. It is necessary to make a value judgment on the basis of combining the essential characteristics of reproduction right. This paper mainly discusses how to regulate the scope of protection of the right of reproduction in the process of revision of copyright Law from two aspects of temporary reproduction and allogenic reproduction. This paper adopts the method of comparative research and case analysis. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is made up of three parts, which respectively introduces the realistic demand that the scope of the protection of reproduction right should be expanded in our country. The performance and cause analysis of the expansion of the scope of the protection of the right of replication in China. This article introduces the scope of protection of the traditional reproduction rights and new forms of expression under the new technological conditions, combined with the third revision of the copyright Law. The first part is the realistic demand that the scope of the protection of the right of reproduction should be expanded. It introduces the concept, development and core characteristics of the right of reproduction. This paper analyzes the lagging nature of the right of reproduction in the present copyright Law, and emphatically expounds the necessity of expanding the scope of the protection of the right of reproduction, from the legislative purpose of the copyright Law and the normative role of the law. This paper discusses the development of foreign trade and briefly introduces the international treaties related to copyright that China has acceded to, and clarifies the relevant responsibilities and obligations. The second part of this paper is the core content of the full text, focusing on the reproduction of the scope of the protection of the performance and reasons for the expansion. Through the introduction of Tencent Inc. v. Wang Youjin, Taobao Company copyright dispute case. Tencent Corporation v. Guangyang Electric Co., Ltd., Jinan Ginza Group copyright dispute case and related legal comments. This paper analyzes the essential content of temporary and allogenic replication and its concrete performance in the case, and expounds the necessity of bringing temporary replication and allogenic replication into the scope of protection of reproduction right from many angles, including its essential characteristics. The trend of international legislation and its maneuverability and implementability, etc., and then draw the conclusion that the scope of protection of the right of reproduction should be expanded, which not only conforms to the trend of international legal development, but also can effectively protect the initiative of creators. Promoting innovation in the field of culture; The third part introduces the extension of the concept of reproduction right in the process of the third revision of copyright Law, and puts forward some suggestions for amendment. At the same time, it clarifies that any rights are not absolute. At the same time, we should perfect the restriction system of reproduction right, such as reasonable use. It also introduces the basic contents of the system of reasonable use and legal permission and its legal provisions in various countries. At the same time, it expounds the relevant provisions of reasonable use and legal permission in the current copyright Law of China. . Analysis of its shortcomings, to continue to improve China's right to copy the right to limit system.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】