对物权变动理论现实意义的评析——以《物权法》第24条为引子

发布时间：2018-01-13 10:56

本文关键词：对物权变动理论现实意义的评析——以《物权法》第24条为引子　出处：《枣庄学院学报》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：基于法律行为的物权变动理论主要有三种学说,其中以物权形式主义和债权形式主义最具有代表性,物权形式主义即物权行为无因性理论,债权形式主义即所谓的折中说,我国根据现实国情选择债权形式主义来构建物权变动模式。笔者认为这两种模式本无优劣之分,只是各个国家基于交易安全和交易习惯的不同考虑选择不同而已。债权形式主义与物权形式主义互有借鉴,债权形式主义的物权变动模式加上公示公信制度和善意取得制度辅助能够较好地维护第三方的交易安全,但这种模式也并非无懈可击,本文以《物权法》第24条为引子,基于现实意义对物权变动模式进行评析,从现实中发现问题,剖析问题,提供试探性改进思路。
[Abstract]:There are three main theories in the theory of real right change based on legal act, in which formalism of real right and formalism of creditor's rights are the most representative, formalism of real right is the theory of non-causality of act of real right. The formalism of creditor's rights is the so-called compromise theory. According to the reality of our country, we choose the formalism of creditor's rights to construct the mode of real right change. The author thinks that there is no difference between the two models. Only different countries based on the transaction security and trading habits of different considerations are different. Creditor's right formalism and real right formalism can be used for reference. The real right change mode of creditor's right formalism, together with the system of publicity and public trust and the system of acquisition in good faith, can better safeguard the transaction security of third party, but this mode is not impeccable. Based on the introduction of article 24 of Real right Law, this paper comments on the mode of real right change, finds problems in reality, analyzes problems and provides tentative ideas for improvement.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.2
【正文快照】： 一、引子:《物权法》第24条我们所讲的物权变动模式主要是法律行为引起的物权变动,因为在引起物权变动的法律事实中最重要的是法律行为,各国物权立法中对物权变动理论模式的选择关乎整个物权法的法条定义和现实操作,影响巨大。大陆法系民法在基于法律行为的物权变动上主要有三

【相似文献】