网络“道德谴责”舆论中的隐私保护问题

发布时间：2018-02-09 01:39

  本文关键词： 网络道德谴责 舆论表达 隐私侵权 隐私保护　出处：《南京大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着互联网对社会生活的全面介入,"道德谴责"也从现实环境延伸到了网络空间,借助于互联网所独有的信息传播及交互方式,谴责性言论的表达变得更为便利和迅速,所发挥的舆论效应也更为持久和深远。但同时,网络"道德谴责"也因互联网所存在着的匿名、自由、虚拟的特点呈现出了大量的负面形态,其中尤为凸出的,就是大量的个人隐私在其中所遭受到的非法收集和泄露,以及由此而引发的对隐私主体的一系列伤害。而另一方面,在互联网的冲击下,隐私本身又出现了一些新的变化,不仅包含的内容范围进一步扩大,也因其数据化的呈现方式而变得更易被窃取和扩散。在这种情况下,网民们往往没有意识到自己的某些爆料、转载等行为其实已经跨越了法律的界限,构成了对他人隐私权的侵权。鉴于"道德谴责"在维护社会秩序方面所具有的独特效应,以及保护个人隐私不被非法侵害的重要价值,有必要对网络"道德谴责"中涉及隐私事项的舆论表达予以规范和设限,以规避可能发生的侵害他人隐私权的行为。因此,本文将主要以隐私保护为切入点,来重新审视网络"道德谴责"舆论表达的合理合法性,希望能在明确舆论发声边界的基础上实现对公民隐私权的保护,进而助力"道德谴责"积极效应的更大发挥。除了绪论和结语,本文主要分为四个部分:第一部分,是对"道德谴责"的基本梳理和理论概述。主要包括概念界定、互联网环境下的效应强化以及实际运行状况,在点明现实存在的异化形态之后,对其法理基础、法律保障和限制进行分析;第二部分,明确互联网环境下隐私自身出现的变化,结合实际案例对网络"道德谴责"舆论中的突出内容予以归纳和分析,有针对性地探讨这些舆论内容与法律隐私之间的相关性;第三部分,则主要以隐私权为切入点,从隐私侵权行为的法律构成要件来具体分析网络"道德谴责"舆论表达中涉及到的隐私侵权行为,并兼及对当前较有争议的"被遗忘权"和"公共场所隐私权"的讨论;第四部分,正视问题以期找到协调之道。具体分析网络"道德谴责"舆论涉及隐私事项的不同情况,运用价值衡量与利益最大化的辩证思维,在舆论表达与隐私保护之间做出取舍,结合实际情况区别设定不同的隐私保护规则,为网络"道德谴责"划定合理合法的范围边界,以期实现互联网环境下"道德谴责"舆论表达与隐私保护之间的协调与平衡。
[Abstract]:With the full involvement of the Internet in social life, "moral condemnation" extends from the real environment to cyberspace. With the help of the unique way of information dissemination and interaction on the Internet, the expression of reprimand speech becomes more convenient and rapid. But at the same time, due to the anonymity, freedom and fictitious features of the Internet, Internet "moral condemnation" has shown a large number of negative forms, especially highlighted. That is, the illegal collection and disclosure of a large number of personal privacy, and a series of injuries to the privacy subject arising therefrom. On the other hand, under the impact of the Internet, there have been some new changes in privacy itself. Not only has the content been further expanded, but it has also become more vulnerable to theft and diffusion because of the way it is presented. In this case, netizens are often unaware of some of their own revelations. Such acts as reprinting have actually crossed the legal line and constitute an infringement of the right to privacy of others... Given the unique effect of "moral condemnation" in maintaining social order and the important value of protecting individuals from unlawful violations of their privacy, It is necessary to regulate and restrict the expression of public opinion concerning privacy matters in the network "moral condemnation" in order to avoid the possible behavior of infringing upon the privacy of others. Therefore, this paper will mainly take privacy protection as the starting point. To re-examine the reasonableness and legitimacy of the public opinion expression of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and hope that the protection of citizens' right to privacy can be realized on the basis of clear boundaries of public opinion's voice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is mainly divided into four parts: the first part is the basic combing and theoretical overview of "moral condemnation", mainly including the definition of the concept. After pointing out the dissimilation form of the reality, the author analyzes its legal basis, legal protection and limitation. The second part is to clarify the changes of privacy itself in the Internet environment. Combined with practical cases, the paper summarizes and analyzes the prominent contents of public opinion of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and probes into the correlation between these public opinion contents and legal privacy. The third part mainly focuses on the right to privacy as the starting point. From the legal constitution of privacy tort, this paper concretely analyzes the privacy tort involved in the public opinion expression of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and also discusses the controversial "right to be forgotten" and "right to privacy in public places". Part 4th, face up to the problem in order to find a way to coordinate. The concrete analysis of the network "moral condemnation" public opinion involved in privacy matters, using the dialectical thinking of value measurement and profit maximization. Making a trade-off between public opinion expression and privacy protection, setting different rules of privacy protection according to the actual situation, and delineating a reasonable and legitimate boundary of scope for "moral condemnation" on the Internet. In order to achieve the Internet environment "moral condemnation" public opinion expression and privacy protection coordination and balance.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923;G206
，

本文编号：1496771