关键证人出庭作证的欧洲模式及其借鉴意义

发布时间：2018-02-15 13:40

本文关键词： 关键证人欧洲模式对质权　出处：《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《欧洲保障人权和基本自由公约》第6条的起草过程表明该条具有对抗制内核。欧洲法院对质权判例的发展过程,就是深植于第6条的对抗制内核的缓慢展开过程。欧洲人权法院在处理对质权问题时采取双层分析模式。经由双层分析模式,将对质权的保障纳入公正审判权的视野中予以考虑。为贯彻双层分析模式,欧洲法院创设了三步检测方法,即先后审查证人不出庭的合理根据、书面证言是否是不利于被告人的唯一或决定性证据、是否存在其他平衡因素抵消书面证言给被告人造成的不利影响。借鉴欧洲人权法院判例,中国应当明确关键证人出庭作证的实体必要性要素和程序必要性要素,同时应当明确关键证人不出庭作证的情形及判断标准。
[Abstract]:The drafting process of article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and fundamental Freedoms shows that it has a confrontational kernel. The slow development of the core of the adversarial system, which is deeply rooted in Article 6. The European Court of Human Rights has adopted a two-tier analytical model in dealing with the question of pledge. The guarantee of the right to pledge should be considered from the perspective of the right to a fair trial. In order to implement the two-tier analysis model, the European Court of Justice has created a three-step test method, that is, it has successively examined the reasonable grounds for the failure of witnesses to appear in court. Whether the written testimony is the only or decisive evidence against the accused, whether there are other balancing factors to counteract the adverse effects of the written testimony on the defendant... drawing on the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, China should make clear the essentials of substantive necessity and procedural necessity for key witnesses to testify in court, at the same time, it should make clear the situation and judgment standard of key witnesses not appearing in court to testify.
【作者单位】：广东财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D95;DD913;D925.2

【相似文献】