专利侵权法定赔偿中的主体特征和产业属性研究——基于2002-2010年专利侵权案件的实证分析
发布时间:2018-02-27 01:14
本文关键词: 专利侵权 法定赔偿 产业区分 诉前调解 差额利润法 出处:《现代法学》2015年04期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:我国专利侵权法定赔偿存在明显的产业区分特征和多种赔偿计算方法并用倾向。从参考因素看,除权利类型和专利许可费用外,对于快速消费品案件,法院侧重于侵权人生产规模和侵权产品价格;对于耐用消费品案件,法院还会额外关注侵权人的销售范围和侵权行为;对于高新技术产品案件,法院则会参考原告的赔偿请求,并重点关注侵权人有无恶意行为或侵犯国外专利权人的情形。新《专利法》实施后,高新技术产品法定赔偿额有显著提升。在原告损失或侵权获利部分确定之前提下,法院应结合产品的行业特点对不确定因素进行法定赔偿,赔偿总额允许超过100万元限额,对于专利经济贡献难以量化的高新技术产品专利纠纷,应考虑引入技术分摊原则和差额利润法,减少法定赔偿原则的适用。
[Abstract]:Legal compensation for patent infringement in China has obvious characteristics of industrial differentiation and the tendency to use a variety of compensation calculation methods. From the point of view of reference factors, in addition to the types of rights and the cost of patent licensing, for cases of fast moving consumer goods, The court focuses on the scale of the infringer's production and the price of the infringing product; in the case of consumer durable goods, the court will also pay additional attention to the scope of sale and infringement of the infringer; and in the case of high-tech products, the court will refer to the plaintiff's claim for compensation. After the implementation of the new Patent Law, the legal compensation for high-tech products has been significantly increased. Under the premise of partial determination of the plaintiff's loss or profit from infringement, it is also important to focus on whether the infringer has committed malicious acts or infringements on foreign patentees. The court should make legal compensation for the uncertain factors according to the characteristics of the industry of the products. The total amount of compensation is allowed to exceed the limit of 1 million yuan, and it is difficult to quantify the contribution of the patent economy to the patent disputes of high and new technology products. Consideration should be given to introducing the principle of technology sharing and the law of differential profit to reduce the application of the principle of statutory compensation.
【作者单位】: 南京理工大学知识产权学院;
【基金】:2015年国家知识产权局专利事业战略推进计划项目“新常态下江苏特色专利政策法规创新研究”(zlzlxm-A-02) 知识产权“十三五”规划研究项目“国家整体利益最大化原则下知识产权强国建设的路径研究”(15428280)
【分类号】:D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 钱玉文;;论我国知识产权法定赔偿制度的司法适用[J];社会科学家;2008年02期
2 陈健;;知识产权法定赔偿面临的问题及对策[J];盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版);2009年01期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 朱启莉;我国知识产权法定赔偿制度研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
2 贺宁馨;我国专利侵权诉讼有效性的实证研究[D];华中科技大学;2012年
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 钱玉文;骆福林;;论我国知识产权法中的惩罚性赔偿[J];法学杂志;2009年04期
2 张春艳;;我国知识产权法定赔偿制度之反思与完善[J];法学杂志;2011年05期
3 莫e,
本文编号:1540483
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1540483.html