关于我国通知移除制度的法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-02 14:04

本文选题：通知移除制度　切入点：版权　出处：《山西财经大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：通知移除制度是在大数据时代的背景下,于20世纪后期借鉴美国《千禧年数字版权法》中的避风港制度引入我国,目的是为了协调权利人、网络服务提供者、侵权人的利益关系,有效的制止侵权行为的发生,建立权利人维权的法律机制,促进网络行业的健康发展。它是指权利人的权利在被网络服务提供者或者其服务对象侵犯的情况下,可以享有通知网络服务提供者删除侵权内容的权利。现在我国各大视频网站为夺取市场份额互相争抢,矛盾问题持续出现,反应出国内知识产权保护情况的混乱,也体现了通知移除制度进入国内之后并没有达到其设立的根本目的,这原因不仅包含通知移除制度在现存法律制度中的设计缺陷,也有在实践中权利人、服务提供者以及网络服务对象三者之间碰撞所产生的问题。国内在借鉴通知移除制度的时候,只是选取了其主体内容,法律条文有明显的不足。美国是判例法国家,因此其能以在司法活动中利用判例明确部分处理上述问题的方式,进而持续健全通知移除制度。我国遵守大陆法体系,有制定法的习惯,必须把相关问题先予立法之后再执行。本文创新性的从知识产权各个领域的现实事实部分出发,分析国内创造的通知移除制度无法很好的限制网络侵权情况,提出完善的建议。本文从通知移除制度的基础概念出发并结合实践,尝试利用通知移除制度的法理,掌握服务提供者和权利人、网络用户的各种关联,分析通知的形式以及内容要求,且关键探究服务提供者的义务,并将这些相关理论的具体适用情形加以分析,再与美国避风港制度作出比较,进行有效性分析,最终得出完善的建议。通过该制度在知识产权领域各方面的适用情况可知,通知移除制度在司法实践中存在责任承担无法确定以及权利滥用的情况,主要是制度上缺陷导致的。但不能完全的、直接的、简单的照搬美国的相关规定。笔者认为,当前我国通知移除制度应该以完善立法为主,辅以其他高效便捷的方法,制定出合理适用的规则以及行之有效的措施。
[Abstract]:Under the background of big data's era, the notice removal system was introduced into China in 20th century with reference to the "Millennium Digital copyright Law" in the United States, in order to coordinate the rights holders and network service providers. The interests of the infringer, the effective prevention of the occurrence of the infringement, and the establishment of a legal mechanism for the rights holders to protect their rights, To promote the healthy development of the network industry. It means that the rights of the right holder are infringed upon by the network service provider or their clients, Can enjoy the right to notify the network service provider to delete the infringing content. Now the major video websites in our country are competing for each other's market share, and contradictions continue to appear, reflecting the confusion in the protection of domestic intellectual property rights. It also reflects that the notice removal system has not achieved the basic purpose of its establishment after entering the country. This reason includes not only the design defects of the notice removal system in the existing legal system, but also the obligee in practice. The problems arising from the collision among service providers and network service objects. When the system of removal of notice is used for reference in China, only its main content is selected, and the legal provisions are obviously inadequate. The United States is a case law country. Therefore, it can deal with the above problems in the way of using the clear part of the jurisprudence in judicial activities, thus continuously perfecting the system of notification removal. Our country adheres to the system of civil law and has the habit of making laws. We must first legislate the relevant issues before implementing them. From the realistic facts in various fields of intellectual property rights, this paper analyzes that the system of removal of notices created in China cannot well limit the situation of network infringement. From the basic concept of notice removal system and combined with practice, this paper tries to use the legal theory of notice removal system to grasp the various connections between service provider, right owner and network user. The form and content of the notice are analyzed, and the obligations of the service provider are explored, and the specific application of these theories is analyzed, and then compared with the U. S. Shelter system, the effectiveness of the system is analyzed. Through the application of the system in the field of intellectual property, we can see that the system of removal of notice exists in judicial practice, the responsibility can not be determined and abuse of rights. It is mainly caused by institutional defects. However, it cannot completely, directly and simply copy the relevant provisions of the United States. The author believes that the current system of notification removal in our country should focus on improving legislation, supplemented by other efficient and convenient methods. Work out reasonable applicable rules and effective measures.
【学位授予单位】：山西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】