继承回复请求权研究

发布时间：2018-03-04 00:03

本文选题：继承回复请求权　切入点：性质　出处：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国《继承法》第2条规定,继承从被继承人死亡时开始。同时《物权法》第29条规定：因继承或者受遗赠取得物权的,自继承或者受遗赠开始时发生效力。因此,自继承开始之时起,继承人即概括地取得被继承人一切财产。但是此种取得,仅仅是观念上的取得,而在实际上,继承人未必对被继承人的所有的遗产为实际上之占有、支配。在现实生活中,遗产受到侵害的情形是很常见的。为了更好地保护继承人的继承权,有必要借鉴域外法,完善我国继承法中的继承回复请求权的规定。本文除了引言外,共分为五部分。第一部分继承回复请求权概述。本部分主要从继承回复请求权的历史沿革、概念界定和功能三个方面来进行阐述。继承回复请求权源自罗马法上的继承诉,继承诉是继承人以继承身份为基础而提起的据以要求实际获得死者财产的诉讼。其后,各国或地区立法,均继受了罗马法上的继承诉制度。在概念界定上,众说纷纭。本文认为,继承回复请求权是继承人于其继承权受到侵害时享有的独立的、包括的原状回复请求权。同时,继承回复请求权具有保护继承人利益、节约诉讼资源和维护社会和平秩序的功能。第二部分继承回复请求权的性质以及与其他请求权的关系。关于继承回复请求权的性质,存在“继承人地位回复说”、“遗产回复请求权说”、“继承资格确认与遗产回复请求权说”三种学说。本文倾向于“遗产回复请求权说”中的“独立权利说”。至于继承回复请求权与物权请求权、损害赔偿请求权的关系,本文认为均是竞合的关系。第三部分大陆法系主要国家及地区继承回复请求权立法及评析。本部分通过对这些国家及地区的立法状况的介绍,以期为未来我国继承回复请求权的完善提供知识储备和理论基础。第四部分继承回复请求权的构成与行使。本文认为继承回复请求权的要件有四。第一,无继承权人已事实上占有遗产。第二,遗产占有人占有遗产没有合法的根据。第三,提起继承回复请求的权利人须是合法继承人。第四,继承权受到侵害是因为否认真正继承人的继承权而发生。至于继承回复请求权的行使,本文主要从行使主体、行使方式和行使效力三个方面展开论述。第五部分继承回复请求权的完善。首先探讨我国继承回复请求权的不足,然后结合国外立法和相关的理论研究得出我国立法完善的建议,拟出相关的法律条文。
[Abstract]:Article 2 of the inheritance Law of our country stipulates that inheritance shall begin at the time of the death of the deceased. Meanwhile, Article 29 of the Law of Real Rights stipulates that the acquisition of real rights by inheritance or bequest shall take effect from the beginning of the inheritance or bequest. Since the beginning of the succession, the heir has generally acquired all the property of the deceased... but such acquisition is merely a conceptual acquisition, and in practice the heir does not necessarily have actual possession of all the estate of the deceased, In order to better protect the heirs' inheritance, it is necessary to draw lessons from the extraterritorial law and perfect the provisions of inheritance reply claim in the inheritance law of our country. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts. The first part is an overview of the claim right of succession reply. This part mainly expounds the history, concept definition and function of the claim of succession reply. The claim of succession reply originates from the succession action in Roman law. Succession action is an action brought by an heir on the basis of the status of succession to claim the actual acquisition of the property of the deceased. Subsequently, the legislation of various countries or regions has been followed by the succession action system in Roman law. This article holds that the claim for succession reply is an independent right of the heirs when their inheritance rights are infringed, including the right to claim in the original state. At the same time, the right of the claim of succession reply has the protection of the interests of the heirs. The function of saving litigation resources and maintaining social peace and order. The second part is about the nature of the claim of succession reply and its relationship with other claims. There are three kinds of theories: "claim of successor status", "claim right of inheritance reply", "claim of inheritance qualification and claim of estate reply". This paper tends to "independent right theory" in "claim of inheritance reply". The right of reply and the right of claim in real right, The relationship of claim for damages is considered to be the relationship of concurrence. The third part is the legislation and analysis of the right to claim for succession in the main countries and regions of the civil law system. This part introduces the legislative situation of these countries and regions. In order to provide the knowledge reserve and theoretical basis for the improvement of the right of inheritance and reply in the future. 4th part of the constitution and exercise of the claim of inheritance reply. This paper holds that there are four elements for the claim of succession reply. First, the person without inheritance has actually possessed the estate. Second, the possessor has no legal basis for the possession of the estate. Third, there is no legal basis for the possession of the estate by the person in possession of the inheritance. The obligee must be the legal heir. 4th, the right of inheritance is infringed because of the denial of the right of inheritance of the true heir. As for the exercise of the right of claim for reply of succession, this paper mainly discusses the subject of the right of claim. This paper discusses the mode of exercise and the effect of exercise. Part 5th the perfection of the claim right of succession reply. Firstly, this paper discusses the deficiency of the claim right of succession reply in our country, and then draws up the relevant legal provisions by combining with the foreign legislation and the relevant theoretical research to draw up the suggestion of perfecting the legislation of our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.5

【参考文献】