当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

论债权多重让与下的权利归属

发布时间:2018-03-04 01:04

  本文选题:债权让与 切入点:权利归属 出处:《河北经贸大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:经济学家麦克劳德曾说,“假如问我们谁是对社会财富影响最为深刻的人?在经过深思后我们会笃定的答道——最先发现债权能够交易的人。”现代交易不再局限于实物交易,债权作为一种无形财产,作为一种交易客体日益引发关注。伴随着债权财产价值的突显,债权的财产功能日受重视,对债权让与的安全性有了更高的要求。债权多重让与问题,作为一种威胁债权安全让与的问题,显然有悖于债权交易安全的要求、违反诚实守信的民法原则,冲击稳定发展的经济秩序和社会秩序。该问题不但已经走入人们日常生活,也引起了学界的广泛关注。如何解决债权纠纷,明确债权多重让与发生时的权利归属、平衡债权让与当事人之间的利益,维护经济生活的稳定有序已经刻不容缓。因此,在修订民法典这个大背景下,本文力图对债权多重让与下的权利归属问题进行研究,希望引起立法者对于债权多重让与问题的关注。在完善民法立法的契机下,填补我国立法关于此问题的漏洞,找到有利于债权让与的立法之路,促使债权功能实现。本文采用法理解释学,比较法学和实践研究的方法对债权多重让与下的权利归属问题进行探讨。立足我国立法现状和实践,指出我国关于债权多重让与问题的立法状态,在综合分析国外关于此问题的先进立法经验的同时,为如何完善我国债权多重让与立法以启示和借鉴。在完善债权让与及债权多重让与立法的前提下,提出建立符合我国国情的债权多重让与权利归属制度或者规则的建议,引导债权让与的健康有序发展。本文共分为五部分对债权多重让与下的权利归属进行详细论述:第一部分为引言。具体阐述选题背景和意义,国内外关于此现象的探究现状。并介绍了本文采用的研究方法和提出的创新点,为整篇文章写作奠定根基。第二部分为债权多重让与下权利归属的基础理论和一般问题的概述。基于狭义的债权让与定义、在经济学和法学视角下对产生债权多重让与的原因展开剖析。在对比两大法系关于债权让与和多重让与制度与立法发展进程的基础下,结合我国债权让与制度发展进程,对债权多重让与下的权利归属展开界定,从而为构建我国债权多重让与权利归属规则提供理论支持。第三部分主要为债权多重让与下权利归属的比较法考察与借鉴。分析两大法系主要代表国家以及国际公约关于此问题的立法规定,总结出当今世界或者地区对此问题的解决主要采取三种规则或者制度。在分析与对比三大主流规则利弊的基础上,归纳出适应我国国情的处理债权多重让与问题的经验借鉴。第四部分是对我国债权多重让与下权利归属的现状与存在问题之阐述。在对我国债权多重让与下权利归属的立法规定和学者的争议进行分析的基础上,总结出我国立法与实践中关于债权多重让与主要存在着债权多重让与下权利归属规则不明晰、受让人权益保障水平低、债权移转时间的规定缺乏确切性,债权让与缺乏对抗债务人以外第三人的要件等现实问题。为完善我国立法、构建债权多重让与权利归属规则,解决多重让与下权利归属问题指明方向。第五部分是重构我国债权多重让与下权利归属制度的建议。在结合国情、选择适用“通知在先权利在先”规则处理债权多重让与权利归属问题的基础上,提出建立并完善债权多重让与权利归属制度的建议。完善当前关于债权让与及债权多重让与的立法规定的同时,设计配套的债权多重让与的法律规制措施,降低债权多重让与发生的风险,并为该问题的发生提供法律支持,使该问题解决有法可依,从而促进法治社会的构建。
[Abstract]:The economist Macleod once said, "if we asked who is the most profound influence on the social wealth for people? In the thoughtful after we will sure answer - first discovered the creditor's right to the deal." modern trading is no longer limited to barter, the creditor's rights as a kind of intangible property, as a transaction object is increasingly causing concern. Along with the creditor property highlight the value of the creditor's rights, property and functions of attention, the safety of credit assignment have higher requirements. The multiple claims, as a threat to the security of creditor's rights assignment problem, obviously contrary to claims of transaction security requirements, in violation of the principles of civil law of honesty and trustworthiness, stable development impact the economic order and social order. This problem not only has entered people's daily life, but also caused widespread concern in academic circles. How to solve the debt disputes, clear multiple claims occurred When the balance between the rights of ownership, the transfer of creditor's rights in the interests of the parties, to maintain stable and orderly economic life is urgent. Therefore, in the background of the revised civil code, this paper tries to question the right belongs to the multiple claims under study, hope to attract lawmakers for multiple assignment problem. To perfect the civil law legislation the opportunity, to fill the gaps in our legislation on this issue, find in favor of the transfer of creditor's rights legislation, prompted claims function realization. This paper uses the legal hermeneutics, ownership of multiple claims under the method of comparative law research and practice are discussed. Based on the current situation and practice of China's legislation, pointed out that our country about the multiple claims of the legislation, in the comprehensive analysis on this issue abroad advanced legislative experience at the same time, how to improve China's multiple The legislation of the enlightenment and reference. In the premise of improving the transfer of creditor's rights and multiple claims legislation, put forward to establish our country's multiple claims ownership system or rules, and guide the healthy and orderly development of the transfer of creditor's rights. This article is divided into five parts of rights belonging to the multiple claims under detail: the first part is the introduction. Elaborated the background and significance, research status quo about this phenomenon at home and abroad. And introduces the research methods used in this paper and the innovation points, and laid the foundation for the whole article writing. The second part is an overview of the basic theory of ownership rights and the general problem of multiple assignment. The assignment of the narrow definition based on the perspective of economics and law on the causes of multiple assignments are explored. In contrast to the two law on the transfer of creditor's rights and make multiple The foundation and development process of the system and legislation, combined with the development process of the transfer of creditor's rights system in China, launched the definition of ownership rights under the multiple claims, so as to provide theoretical support for the construction of China's multiple claims ownership rules. The third part is the multiple claims under the comparative law of rights of investigation and reference analysis. On behalf of the two countries and the International Convention on the issue of legislation, summed up the solution to this problem in the world today or regions mainly adopt three kinds of rules or system. Based on the analysis and comparison of advantages and disadvantages of the three main flow rules, summed up the adaptation problem of processing multiple claims in our country experience fourth. This part is the present situation and the existence of rights of our country under the multiple assignment problem. In our country the multiple claims under the ownership of rights legislation The basis of the analysis of regulations and scholars dispute, summed up the legislation and practice in our country about the multiple claims there are multiple claims under the rules of the rights of ownership is not clear, the protection of the rights and interests of the low level, the lack of precise time transfer provisions of creditor's rights, creditor's rights assignment lack third against the other elements practical problems. To improve our legislation, constructing multiple claims ownership rules, to solve the problem of ownership rights under the multiple assignment direction. The fifth part is the proposal for the reconstruction of the rights of ownership of our country with the multiple claims. In combination with the national conditions, choose to apply the "notice first right" rules to deal with the multiple claims of ownership rights the problem, put forward to establish and perfect the multiple claims ownership system. To improve the current on the transfer of creditor's rights and multiple claims At the same time, we need to design the legal regulation measures of the multiple transfer of creditor's rights, reduce the risk of multiple assignment of creditor's rights, and provide legal support for the occurrence of the problem, so that we can solve this problem and provide a legal basis for it, so as to promote the construction of a rule of law society.

【学位授予单位】:河北经贸大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 苏兆勇;何惠莹;;论债权让与的生效[J];当代经理人;2006年15期

2 张良;;完善我国债权让与制度的思考[J];中州学刊;2006年05期

3 肖婉珍;;对债权让与制度若干问题的探讨[J];河北经贸大学学报(综合版);2007年04期

4 孙茜;;将来债权让与可行性分析[J];法制与社会;2008年23期

5 黄小育;;我国债权让与制度的完善[J];行政与法;2009年12期

6 胡雨春;曹宇;;论债权让与通知的效力——兼对债权让与通知传统理论的反思[J];法制与社会;2010年18期

7 李艳斐;;债权让与通知若干法律问题之我见[J];法制与社会;2010年26期

8 裴丽萍;论债权让与的若干基本问题[J];中国法学;1995年06期

9 夏恒信,卢俊山,冯继华;论债权让与若干问题[J];山东审判;1998年05期

10 汪传才;论债权让与的通知[J];华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年03期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 李宇;;债权让与和债权质押制度的统一[A];2014年第五届全国民商法学博士生学术论坛论文摘要集[C];2014年

2 申建平;;债权让与制度之历史演进[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——20世纪外国刑事法律的理论与实践[C];2005年

3 李雯;;以转让方式转移拟证券化债权资产的相关法律问题探讨[A];2008全国博士生学术论坛(国际法)论文集——国际公法、国际私法分册[C];2008年

相关重要报纸文章 前8条

1 姜春玲;债权让与各方当事人利益平衡之我见[N];江苏法制报;2006年

2 林劲标邋凌蔚 游春亮;出庭也是债权让与通知方式[N];法制日报;2008年

3 中国政法大学民商经济法学院 赵廉慧;债权让与禁止之约定的效力[N];人民法院报;2008年

4 钱利芳;债权让与了 受让人应该还债[N];江苏经济报;2006年

5 案例编写人 重庆市巫山县人民法院 蒋家富;普通提货单转让的法律属性系债权让与[N];人民法院报;2010年

6 朱大伦;债权让与应当由让与人通知债务人[N];人民法院报;2007年

7 马串莲;债务人能否自愿向债权受让人清偿债务[N];人民法院报;2002年

8 记者 施浩;“定制”受让人 春晖股份易主趋明朗[N];上海证券报;2014年

相关博士学位论文 前3条

1 申建平;债权让与制度研究[D];厦门大学;2006年

2 杨骥;论保理业务对传统债权让与理论的冲击和变革[D];湖南大学;2014年

3 杨春华;金钱债权有效实现保障论[D];西南政法大学;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 朱浩杰;论债权让与通知的效力[D];华东政法大学;2008年

2 吕洪成;债权让与制度研究[D];重庆大学;2008年

3 吴鑫磊;债权让与之法律结构[D];西南政法大学;2009年

4 陈坤;论债权让与制度中的通知[D];中国政法大学;2010年

5 余崇顺;债权让与制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年

6 曾海峰;债权让与制度研究[D];南昌大学;2011年

7 孙杰;“熟人社会”背景下债权让与中的主张力减弱现象观察[D];山东大学;2011年

8 郑远园;实务中的债权让与制度[D];华东政法大学;2012年

9 夏斌;债权让与公示问题研究[D];暨南大学;2014年

10 丁洁心;债权双重让与之法效果研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年



本文编号:1563453

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1563453.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户62d3c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com