民间借贷涉罪案件处理模式的反思与重构

发布时间：2018-03-04 04:27

本文选题：刑民交叉　切入点：民间借贷　出处：《天津师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：对于民间借贷涉罪案件,司法机关依照"先刑后民"的原则进行处理,导致诸多理论弊端和实务困境。根据刑法适用统一性的要求处理刑民交叉案件,首先应明确违法性判断的理论。在民间借贷涉罪案件中,民事违法不是肯定刑事违法的前提性条件,如果因借贷合同无效或者因意思瑕疵导致合同可撤销,应先从民事角度对被害人的相关权益进行救济,不能均以犯罪论处。在具体路径建构中,应当从程序启动和实体判决两方面予以完善。
[Abstract]:As for the cases involving folk loan and loan, the judicial organs deal with the cases according to the principle of "first punishing the people before the people", which leads to many theoretical malpractices and practical dilemmas. According to the requirement of the unity of the criminal law application, the judicial organs deal with the cross-criminal cases. First of all, we should make clear the theory of judgment of illegality. In the case of civil lending related crimes, civil violation is not a prerequisite for affirming criminal illegality. If the loan contract is invalid or the contract can be revoked because of the defect of the meaning, It is necessary to remedy the victims' rights and interests from a civil point of view, not all of them be treated as crimes. In the construction of specific paths, we should perfect them from two aspects: the start of procedure and the substantive judgment.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;西南政法大学;日本中央大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目(13BXF057) 司法部课题项目(12SFB2023) 重庆市教委研究生创新项目(CYB14070)
【分类号】：D923.6;D925.1

【相似文献】