论我国知识产权领域惩罚性损害赔偿制度的完善

发布时间：2018-03-09 21:56

本文选题：知识产权　切入点：惩罚性损害赔偿　出处：《辽宁大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：现阶段我国知识产权侵权案件仍屡见不鲜、频繁发生,与此同时暴露出我国知识产权保护机制存在的诸多缺陷和问题。惩罚性赔偿制度的适用能够有效遏制侵权行为,全面弥补受害人的损失,是解决该问题的重要手段。2014年5月施行的新《商标法》第六十三条增添了对情节严重且主观存在恶意的侵权行为能够予以惩罚性赔偿的规定,惩罚性赔偿金依据补偿性损害赔偿中的受害人所受的利益亏损、侵权人非法得利、商标许可使用费的倍数该三种方式之一的一倍以上三倍以下来确定,标志了惩罚性赔偿制度的正式引入。同时,《著作权法》第三次修正草案送审稿、《专利法》第四次修订建议稿也对该制度进行了规定。毋庸置疑,惩罚性赔偿制度将发挥重要的影响作用。然而,我国学术界、实务界对于该制度的适用条件、参考因素、赔偿额度等基本问题仍争论不已,研究不够全面、深入、系统,特别是在司法实践运用的讨论不足,以致于法官在具体运用时困难重重,影响裁判的效率和结果。因此,深入、系统地考察商标权、专利权、著作权侵权惩罚性损害赔偿制度,分析制度的正当性、合理性,为我国知识产权保护的立法和司法提供理论支撑,这是当前知识产权理论界和实务界面临的十分紧迫而重要的任务。本文从我国知识产权法引入惩罚性赔偿制度的价值目的角度为切入点,首先明确其适用源于知识产权自身的无形性、可复制性的权利特点,分析知识产权目前在补偿性赔偿制度下存在诸多问题,阐明惩罚性赔偿制度能够解决这些缺陷问题,之后探讨了该制度的引入符合现代侵权责任法“社会本位”的法理基础。其次,论文重点剖析了知识产权惩罚性赔偿制度当前的立法状况及存在的不足,追根溯源,找到症结所在。最后,借鉴其他国家相关先进立法,结合我国具体国情,探究出完善该制度的具体方法,即在专利权和著作权侵权领域扩大对该制度的适用,明确构成要件,对于惩罚性赔偿金列举了确定时考虑的因素和具体的计算方式,以期通过以上措施完善制度,进而达到遏制侵犯知识产权行为,保护受害人利益的最终目的。
[Abstract]:At present, the cases of intellectual property infringement in our country are still common and frequent. At the same time, many defects and problems exist in the mechanism of intellectual property protection in our country are exposed. The application of punitive damages system can effectively curb the infringement. To make up for the loss of the victim is an important means to solve the problem. The new Trademark Law (63th), which was implemented in May 2014, has added the provision that punitive damages can be awarded for the serious and subjective malicious infringement. The punitive damages shall be determined on the basis of the loss of benefits suffered by the victims of compensatory damages, the illegal enrichment of the infringers, and the multiple of the trademark licensing fees by one to three times of the above three methods. It marks the formal introduction of the punitive damages system. At the same time, the third revision draft of the copyright Law and the 4th revised and proposed draft of the Patent Law also provide for this system. The punitive damages system will play an important role. However, the academic and practical circles of our country still argue over the basic issues of the system's application conditions, reference factors, compensation quotas, and so on, and the research is not comprehensive, thorough and systematic. Especially in the judicial practice the discussion of the application is insufficient, so that the judge has many difficulties in the concrete application, which affects the efficiency and result of the judge. Therefore, the system of punitive damages for trademark right, patent right, copyright infringement is thoroughly and systematically investigated. Analyzing the legitimacy and rationality of the system provides theoretical support for the legislation and judicature of intellectual property protection in China. This is an urgent and important task facing the intellectual property theorists and practitioners. First of all, it is clear that its application originates from the intangible and replicable characteristics of intellectual property rights, analyzes many problems existing in the current compensatory compensation system of intellectual property rights, and clarifies that the punitive damages system can solve these defects. Then it discusses the legal basis of the introduction of the system in line with the "social standard" of the modern tort liability law. Secondly, the paper focuses on analyzing the current legislative situation and existing deficiencies of the punitive damages system of intellectual property rights, and tracing back to the source. Finally, draw lessons from the relevant advanced legislation of other countries, combined with the specific conditions of our country, explore the specific ways to improve the system, that is, in the field of patent rights and copyright infringement to expand the application of the system, clear elements, In order to perfect the system through the above measures, the author enumerates the factors and the concrete calculation methods of determining punitive damages in order to curb the infringement of intellectual property rights and protect the interests of the victims.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.4

【参考文献】