强制清污费用法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-25 08:27

  本文选题：强制清污作业　切入点：民事责任　出处：《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年02期

【摘要】：强制清污作业中,海事管理机构的介入并不改变清污费用的民事责任性质。将强制清污费用在性质上视为民事责任,既符合我国油污损害赔偿的相关立法规定及发展趋势,也更有利于强制清污费用的有效偿付。在强制清污费用的具体实现路径上,鉴于《审理船舶油污案件规定》第11条较为抽象,除存在明显的救助船舶及财产目的外,应将强制清污费用视为预防措施费用。
[Abstract]:In compulsory decontamination operations, the intervention of maritime administrative agencies does not change the nature of civil liability for clean-up expenses. The nature of compulsory decontamination costs is regarded as civil liability, which conforms to the relevant legislative provisions and development trends of oil pollution damage compensation in China. It is also more conducive to the effective reimbursement of compulsory decontamination charges. In the specific path of realizing the compulsory decontamination costs, in view of the abstract nature of Article 11, except for the obvious purpose of salvaging the ship and property, The cost of compulsory decontamination shall be regarded as the cost of preventive measures.
【作者单位】： 北京工商大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科规划基金项目《海洋行政体制改革的法律保障研究》(13BFX037) 北京工商大学青年基金项目《主管机关海难救助报酬请求权研究》(QNJJ2014-04)
【分类号】：D923
，

本文编号：1662320