论专利法中等同原则的适用和限制

发布时间：2018-03-29 01:25

本文选题：等同原则　切入点：专利权　出处：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：等同原则是判断专利权边界的一项重要但又非常模糊的原则。等同原则在国内外还在不断的发展变化中,到目前为止还未形成统一成熟的观点和规则。然而该原则对于专利侵权判定又有着至关重要的作用。本文希望得出等同原则较为明确的适用标准。本文首先深入剖析专利等同原则的形成,从法理角度分析等同原则,对等同原则与权利要求解释的关系以及专利授权的关系进行研究,然后收集归纳国内外对等同原则的适用和发展,得出等同原则的适用条件和范围标准,最后对等同原则的对立原则,禁止反悔原则、捐献原则和全要件原则进行辨析。本文从法理角度出发,追根溯源,以期获得符合立法本意的等同原则的适用规则。同时尝试从专利审查授权角度分析专利等同的依据和范围。尝试将专利创造性高度因素纳入等同适用的宽窄衡量规则中去。并从比较法上对国内外等同原则的使用发展情况进行分析。本文认为,等同原则实际是为了保证社会公众的根本利益,而让渡部分社会公众的短期利益,以确保专利权能得到有效保护。其实际意义在于,无需在公众利益和专利权人利益中摇摆。在适用专利等同原则时,主要考虑权利的稳定预期性和保护的实质有效性两个方面。
[Abstract]:The principle of equivalence is an important but very vague principle in judging the boundary of patent rights. The principle of equivalence is still developing and changing at home and abroad. Up to now, there has not been a unified and mature view and rule. However, this principle plays an important role in the adjudication of patent infringement. This paper hopes to come up with a clear applicable standard of the equivalence principle. Analysis of the formation of the principle of patent equivalence, This paper analyzes the principle of equivalence from the angle of jurisprudence, studies the relationship between the principle of equivalence and the interpretation of claims and the relationship of patent authorization, and then collects and summarizes the application and development of the principle of equivalence at home and abroad. Finally, the author distinguishes the principle of equivalence, the principle of estoppel, the principle of donation and the principle of all elements. At the same time, it tries to analyze the basis and scope of patent equivalence from the point of view of patent examination authorization. This paper analyzes the development of the application of the principle of equivalence at home and abroad from the point of view of comparative law. The principle of equivalence is actually intended to ensure the fundamental interests of the public, while the short-term interests of some members of the public are transferred to ensure that patents are effectively protected. There is no need to swing between the public interest and the interests of the patentee. In the application of the principle of patent equivalence, two aspects are considered, namely, the stable expectation of rights and the substantive effectiveness of protection.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】