对于医疗侵权诉讼中举证责任分配的思考

发布时间：2018-03-31 15:22

本文选题：医疗纠纷　切入点：医疗侵权诉讼　出处：《法制与社会》2016年26期

【摘要】：医疗侵权诉讼作为一种民事诉讼,广受医学界和法学界的共同关注。在实际诉讼中,原被告地位相差大,对于案件掌握信息的程度不对称,为了平衡双方的地位,实现当事人平等的实质要求,如何分配证明责任就显得至关重要。对于这个问题,各国采取的方法各不相同,例如美国的"事实自己说明原则",德国的"表见证明规则"等。从二十世纪末到现在,我国在这个问题上经历过几个阶段,通过调整法律使医患双方承担不同的举证责任,试图缓和医患关系,平息患方的怨气,实现法律公平正义的价值,而实际效果却耐人寻味,故我国在解决医疗纠纷这一现实问题上还有很大的进步空间,这就需要立法者注意到解决纠纷不仅要在法律层面上进行研究,还要完善相关的社会层面,通过一切合理可用的方法使得医疗纠纷得以解决。
[Abstract]:As a kind of civil litigation in medical tort lawsuit, popular common attention in the medical circles and the law circles. In the actual proceedings, the original defendant status difference, the degree of asymmetry information of cases, in order to balance the status of both parties, to achieve substantive requirements of equality, such as where the distribution of proof is very important responsibility for this problem. The method adopted by countries, are not the same, such as the US "in his description of principle", the German "apparent proof rules". From the end of twentieth Century to now, China has experienced several stages in this issue, through the adjustment of the law to bear the burden of proof is different between doctors and patients, to ease the doctor-patient relationship, calm the patient's complaints, achieve fairness and justice, but the actual effect is intriguing, so in this realistic problem to solve the medical dispute on there is still much room for improvement, this needs Legislators should be aware that solving disputes should not only be studied at the legal level, but also improve relevant social levels, so that medical disputes can be resolved through all reasonable and available methods.

【作者单位】：中央司法警官学院;
【分类号】：D925.1;D923

【相似文献】