论善意取得中善意要件的证明责任分配

发布时间：2018-04-02 04:38

本文选题：善意取得　切入点：善意　出处：《海南大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：善意取得制度是立法在所有权的保护与受让人的保护,即静的安全与动的安全之间进行价值取舍和利益权衡过程中逐渐构建起来的一项物权制度。不管是在司法领域还是在实务领域,学者们相对善意取得制度中对于“善意”要件证明责任应当如何分配的观点都各执一词。文章旨在通过实体法与程序法两大领域的分析,寻找出一个更加切合善意取得立法精神,更能体现民事诉讼法公平正义原则,且充分考虑到当事人各方证明难易程度的分配标准,为当前民事诉讼实务领域“善意”要件证明责任分配标准提供一些理论建议。市场经济不断发展,交易的频度和速度也在提升,越来越需要相应的确保交易安全和物上权利实现的法律机制,善意取得制度就是这样的法律机制,在法律范畴上属于民法,近年来,对于善意取得制度的研究逐渐深广,立法也越发完善。善意取得制度在我国法律上的表现是《物权法》第106条对其进行了规定,虽然存在不足之处,对于善意取得制度在我国法律上的发展具有重要的意义。本论文将从以下五部分阐述这一制度：第一部分从分析两个在审判实务工作中具有典型意义的案例入手,引出两个对立的善意要件证明责任分配标准观点,进而引出本文的主题。第二部分分析了当前我国善意要件证明责任分配的立法现状,从语义解释和体系解释两方面,结合与善意相关的其他法条,得出我国现行立法下证明责任由受让人承担。第三部分介绍了证明责任的基本理论以及证明责任分配的规则。第四部分提出了对善意要件证明责任的分配标准进行立法工作完善的相关建议,并认为在目前有待完备的相关立法的情况下,可以赋予法官自由裁量权来作为司法实务部门“善意”证明责任分配混乱的临时解决机制。
[Abstract]:The system of bona fide acquisition is the protection of the legislation in the ownership and the protection of the transferee. That is, a real right system gradually constructed in the course of value trade-off and benefit tradeoff between static security and moving security, whether in the judicial field or in the practical field. Scholars hold different views on how to distribute the burden of proof in bona fide acquisition system. This paper aims at analyzing the two major fields of substantive law and procedural law. Looking for a more bona fide legislative spirit that can better reflect the principle of fairness and justice in civil procedure law, and take fully into account the allocation criteria for the parties to prove the degree of difficulty, It provides some theoretical suggestions for the criterion of "bona fide" burden allocation in the field of civil litigation practice. The market economy is developing constantly, and the frequency and speed of transactions are also increasing. There is more and more need for the corresponding legal mechanism to ensure the security of transactions and the realization of rights in things. The system of bona fide acquisition is such a legal mechanism, which belongs to the civil law in the scope of law. In recent years, the research on the system of bona fide acquisition has gradually deepened. The system of bona fide acquisition in our country's law is stipulated in Article 106 of the Real right Law, although there are some shortcomings, This paper will expound this system from the following five parts: the first part begins with the analysis of two typical cases in the judicial practice. In the second part, the author analyzes the current legislative situation of the burden of proof assignment of bona fide elements in China, from the two aspects of semantic interpretation and system interpretation. Combined with other articles relating to good faith, It is concluded that the burden of proof is borne by the transferee under the current legislation of our country. The third part introduces the basic theory of the burden of proof and the rules of the distribution of the burden of proof. The fourth part puts forward the criteria for the allocation of the burden of proof in good faith. Relevant suggestions for the perfection of legislative work, Under the condition that the relevant legislation is needed, the judge can be given discretion to act as a temporary solution to the confusion in the distribution of the burden of proof in "good faith" in the judicial practice department.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】