论我国网络环境下被遗忘权的立法构建

发布时间：2018-04-02 09:30

本文选题：被遗忘权　切入点：言论自由　出处：《广东财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：当遗忘成为常态,公民的精神利益就存在着受损的可能性,而如何保护公民的这项权益也就成了需要解决的问题。被遗忘权的提出就是基于此。因此,被遗忘权在当今互联网时代有着很强的现实意义。在大数据时代,数据的价值愈发突出,对数据的处理也越来越精细化,世界各国对于个人数据立法越来越重视,而这也带来了数据主体对于自身数据的担忧。在这样的背景下,本文拟通过介绍被遗忘权的渊源,分析其在域外的立法与实践以及通过对我国的立法建议,以期对我国将来的立法有所助益。本文共分为三章:第一章是网络环境下被遗忘权以及我国立法构建的法律障碍。介绍了一下被遗忘权的历史渊源。其中包括从遗忘权到被遗忘权的变迁,被遗忘权构建的合理性以及我们目前立法构建的困境。第二章是域外网络环境下被遗忘权的立法、实践以及借鉴。首先,介绍了欧盟的立法及实践情况。详细解释了欧盟GDPR里的被遗忘权的概念、内容以及救济。其次,介绍了美国的实践情况。由于言论自由在美国地位无可撼动,所以美国没有GDPR意义上的被遗忘权,但是关于言论自由与个人信息保护的平衡也是被努力寻找的对象。再次,介绍了日本、台湾以及OECD的与个人数据以及隐私保护相关立法与文件。最后,通过上述介绍的比较,总结出了实践与立法的几点不同,这对我国的选择具有一定的启发意义。第三章是我国网络环境下被遗忘权的立法构建。通过第一章的初步引入,到第二章的域外深入介绍,最终还是要落脚到我们大陆的立法构建上来。本章首先对被遗忘权的概念做出了界定,其次分析了它的性质与地位,最后详细给出了被遗忘权内容与救济。
[Abstract]:When forgetting becomes the norm, the moral interests of citizens are likely to be damaged, and how to protect the rights and interests of citizens becomes a problem that needs to be solved. The right to be forgotten is of great practical significance in today's Internet age. In big data's time, the value of data has become more and more prominent, the processing of data has become more and more refined, and countries in the world have paid more and more attention to personal data legislation. Under this background, this paper intends to introduce the origin of the right to be forgotten, analyze its legislation and practice abroad, and adopt legislative suggestions to our country. This paper is divided into three chapters: the first chapter is the right to be forgotten under the network environment and the legal obstacles to the legislative construction of our country. This paper introduces the historical origin of the right to be forgotten. The change from the right of forgetting to the right to be forgotten, The second chapter is the legislation, practice and reference of the right to be forgotten under the extraterritorial network environment. This paper introduces the legislation and practice of the European Union. It explains in detail the concept, content and relief of the right to be forgotten in the GDPR of the EU. Secondly, it introduces the practice of the United States. Since the status of freedom of speech in the United States is unassailable, So the United States does not have the right to be forgotten in the sense of GDPR, but the balance between freedom of speech and the protection of personal information is also the object of hard work. Taiwan and OECD's legislation and documents related to personal data and privacy protection. Finally, through the comparison of the above introductions, we conclude that there are several differences between practice and legislation. The third chapter is the legislative construction of the right to be forgotten in the network environment of our country. This chapter firstly defines the concept of the right to be forgotten, then analyzes its nature and status, and finally gives the content and relief of the right to be forgotten in detail.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】