人格要素商业化利用的规制模式选择及制度构建

发布时间：2018-04-03 01:30

本文选题：人格要素　切入点：商业化利用　出处：《江汉论坛》2015年02期

【摘要】：在人格要素商业化利用的浪潮下,如何构建我国的人格要素商业化利用的规制模式成为当务之急。总体来讲,域外有四种规制模式。其中英国及其他英联邦国家的仿冒之诉和世界知识产权组织的反不正当竞争保护模式都存在内在缺陷,难以克服;美国二元论模式下权利归属的正当性值得怀疑,也不利于人格要素中精神利益的保护,还可能给我国造成制度冲击。我国应该借鉴德国"一元论"模式,但德国法上的一般人格权概念应予废弃,以及死后人格要素的精神利益不应继续存在。与此同时,我国未来人格权立法还要明确人格要素商业化利用的实现方式、限制、义务、救济、保护期限等,应构建完整的保护体系。
[Abstract]:Under the tide of commercialized utilization of personality factor, how to construct the regulation mode of commercialized utilization of personality factor in our country becomes an urgent matter.Generally speaking, there are four kinds of regulation modes.Among them, the counterfeiting action of Britain and other Commonwealth countries and the anti-unfair competition protection mode of the World intellectual property Organization have inherent defects, which are difficult to overcome; the legitimacy of the right attribution under the dualism mode of the United States is doubtful.It is also not conducive to the protection of spiritual interests in personality elements, and may cause institutional impact to our country.Our country should draw lessons from the "monism" model of Germany, but the concept of general personality right in German law should be abandoned, and the spiritual interests of personality elements after death should not continue to exist.At the same time, the legislation of personality right in the future in our country should make clear the realization way, limitation, obligation, relief, protection period and so on of the commercial use of personality elements, so we should construct a complete protection system.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会2012年度部级法学研究课题“人格要素的商业化利用及其法律规制”(项目编号:CLS(2012)D140)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】