私权语境下的商标异议制度反思

发布时间：2018-04-15 10:19

本文选题：商标权 + 私权　；参考：《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年04期

【摘要】：商标法律制度的设计与完善应当以商标权的私权属性为基本导向,商标异议制度也不例外。《商标法》第三次修正对商标异议制度作出了积极却并不彻底的改造。通过比较研究、社会实证研究等方法,遵循商标权的私权理念,淡化商标异议制度的社会监督与自我监督功能,强化其私权救济功能,进一步限制商标异议主体的范围。在具体制度设计上,应当妥善处理公权力运用与私权保护的关系,注重绝对理由审查与异议前置程序的调适,构建真正意义上的"行政一审"审查模式,整合现有的商标异议程序与无效程序,引入冷静期等凸显当事人私权自治的制度。
[Abstract]:The design and perfection of trademark legal system should be guided by the private right of trademark right, and the trademark dissent system is no exception. The third amendment of Trademark Law has made a positive but not thorough reform of trademark dissent system.By means of comparative study and social empirical study, the author follows the private right idea of trademark right, desalinates the function of social supervision and self-supervision of trademark dissent system, strengthens its private right relief function, and further limits the scope of trademark dissent subject.In the specific system design, we should properly handle the relationship between the use of public power and the protection of private rights, pay attention to the adjustment of the absolute reason examination and the pre-procedure of dissent, and construct the real mode of "administrative first instance" examination.Integrating the existing trademark dissent procedure with invalid procedure, introducing cooling-off period and highlighting the system of private right autonomy of the parties.
【作者单位】：山东政法学院经济贸易法学院;山东财经大学法学院;
【基金】：山东省社会科学规划研究项目(14CFXJ08) 山东省法学会2015年度研究项目山东政法学院科研发展计划项目(2013F02B) 山东省十二五省级重点学科——经济法学建设项目
【分类号】：D923.43

【参考文献】