公共事项言论界限探究

发布时间：2018-04-19 04:39

  本文选题：公共事项言论 + 现实恶意原则　； 参考：《理论与改革》2015年03期

【摘要】：从事的标准来说,公共利害相关的事实,是指能够对公共利害问题的讨论发挥促进作用的事实,不特定多数的公众批判是具有必要性的,仅仅以公众趣味和好奇心作为对象的事实,以及与人私生活相关的事实,并不能作为与公共利害相关的事实;一个普通的公民,如果从没有拥有过公共性资源,并且只是拥有从媒体获得的极少途径进行自我辩护,相比较公共人物或者政府官员,应当获得更多的法律保护;中国刑法定义的国家工作人员,与美国现实恶意原则所规定的"公职人员",具有很大程度上的重合性。
[Abstract]:In the standard of engagement, the fact that public stakeholders are relevant refers to the fact that they can contribute to the discussion of issues of public interest, and that it is necessary not to have a specific majority of public criticism.The fact that public interest and curiosity are the object, and the fact of one's private life, cannot be regarded as a fact of public interest; an ordinary citizen, if he has never possessed a public resource,And they only have very few ways to defend themselves from the media. They deserve more legal protection than public figures or government officials.There is a great degree of coincidence with the "public official" stipulated by the malevolent principle in the United States.
【作者单位】： 江南大学;
【基金】：江南大学自主科研计划青年项目:网络社会公民名誉权的刑事法律保护问题研究(JUSRP11573),项目负责人:胡杰
【分类号】：D923;D924.3
，

本文编号：1771649