欺诈性抚养案件的法律适用研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 21:26

本文选题：欺诈性抚养 + 法律适用　；参考：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：司法实践中,欺诈性抚养案件越来越多,但是由于我国现行法律体系没有欺诈性抚养的相关规定,给审判带来许多困难。本文笔者选取了一些近年来比较典型的欺诈性抚养案件,总结出该类案件中最常见的争议问题并对争议问题做了分析,明确了欺诈性抚养的法律属性,探讨了被欺诈方被侵害的权利,寻找解决这些争议问题的最合理的法律规范和法理,在不完善的法治环境中,希望能对这一类案件的解决有所裨益。本文除引言外共分为五个部分:引言阐明了本文的选题背景、研究综述、研究目的和研究意义等。第一部分,欺诈性抚养法律属性的认定。本部分介绍了学者们提出的关于欺诈性抚养法律属性的四种学说即无效行为说、不当得利行为说、无因管理行为说及侵权行为说,并通过对该四种学说进行深入研究和分析,笔者认为以侵权行为说来定性欺诈性抚养的法律属性是最恰当的。第二部分,欺诈性抚养侵害的民事权利。本部分主要从理论上出发,寻找被欺诈方损害赔偿的请求权基础,分析了欺诈性抚养关系中被欺诈方被侵害的权利包括财产权、亲权、配偶权、生育权、知情权和名誉权。第三部分,欺诈性抚养案件法律适用中的主要争议问题。本部分通过对几个比较典型案例的概括、分析,归纳出在欺诈性抚养案件法律适用过程中存在的诸如案由如何确定、离婚前的抚养费是否返还、精神损害赔偿请求是否应当支持、赔偿主体如何确定等争议问题。第四部分,解决欺诈性抚养案件法律适用中争议问题的建议。本部分笔者在前面几部分分析的基础上,找到笔者认为解决这些争议问题的最合理的法律依据和法理。第五部分,结语。本部分主要明确欺诈性抚养案件不仅涉及到损害赔偿的问题,还牵涉到身份关系变更的问题,故笔者呼吁应该早日完善欺诈性抚养相关立法。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, there are more and more cases of fraudulent maintenance, but the current legal system of our country does not have the relevant provisions of fraudulent maintenance, which brings a lot of difficulties to the trial. The author selects some typical cases of fraudulent maintenance in recent years, summarizes the most common disputes in this kind of cases, analyzes the dispute, and clarifies the legal attributes of fraudulent maintenance. This paper probes into the rights of the deceptive party being infringed, and finds out the most reasonable legal norms and legal principles for resolving these disputes. In the imperfect legal environment, the author hopes to be of benefit to the settlement of this kind of cases. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into five parts: the introduction clarifies the background, the research review, the purpose and significance of the research. The first part, the identification of the legal attribute of fraudulent maintenance. This part introduces the four theories on the legal attribute of fraudulent maintenance, namely, the theory of invalid act, the theory of improper enrichment, the theory of no-cause management and the theory of tort, and through the in-depth study and analysis of the four theories. The author thinks that the legal attribute of fraudulent maintenance is the most appropriate. The second part is about the civil rights infringed by fraudulent maintenance. This part mainly starts from the theory, looks for the claim basis of the fraudulent party's damage compensation, analyzes the fraudulent party's right to be infringed in the fraudulent relationship, including the property right, the parental right, the spouse right, the reproductive right, the right to know and the right to reputation. The third part, the main controversial issues in the application of the law of fraudulent maintenance cases. Through the summary of several typical cases, this part summarizes the legal application of fraudulent maintenance cases, such as how to determine the cause of the case, whether to return the maintenance before divorce, Whether the claim for moral damages should be supported, how to determine the subject of compensation and other controversial issues. The fourth part, the suggestion of resolving the dispute in the application of fraudulent maintenance cases. Based on the analysis of the previous parts, the author finds the most reasonable legal basis and legal theory for resolving these disputes. The fifth part, conclusion. In this part, it is made clear that fraudulent maintenance cases are not only related to damages, but also to the change of identity relationship, so the author calls for the improvement of fraudulent maintenance legislation as soon as possible.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】