网络交易平台提供商的专利侵权责任研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 21:10

本文选题：网络交易平台 + 提供商　；参考：《中国政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：二十世纪九十年代以来,互联网技术发展迅速,以互联网技术为基础的网络交易也蓬勃发展起来。随着网络交易规模扩大,交易商品数量暴增,侵犯知识产权的行为也越来越多,对权利人的合法权利以及市场正常运行秩序造成了极大冲击和影响。近年来,网络交易平台每年都会收到并处理大量的知识产权纠纷投诉。与版权和商标相比,专利权在侵权判定上对判定主体有较高的技术性要求,也没有针对网络交易中专利侵权的具体的法律规定。同时,法院对网络交易平台提供商的侵权责任划分和判定也有一定的分歧。上述原因使得网络交易平台提供商在相关专利侵权纠纷中的法律地位、权利和义务尚不够明确。其在处理专利侵权纠纷中也面临诸多难题,包括:在实务操作中如何认定合格有效的“通知”,以及其在收到“通知”后怎样处理才能不承担连带责任等。针对上述问题,笔者结合网络交易平台提供商的概况,根据近几年我国网络交易平台上出现的专利侵权现状,找出其在专利侵权纠纷中所面临的难题,并对其侵权责任的归责原则和构成要件等进行分析。本文试图结合实证案例来研究平台提供商在专利侵权纠纷中的应对方案,提出针对网络交易中出现的专利侵权行为的法律适用的解决思路。本文主要包括五章:第一章讨论网络交易平台提供商的概念和种类,重点对网络交易平台提供商的法律地位和法律义务进行研究。第二章结合宏观数据和典型案例发现网络交易平台提供商在网络交易中出现专利侵权纠纷时所面临的具体问题。第三章主要梳理判定网络交易平台提供商在专利侵权行为中的侵权责任的法律依据,并着重研究其侵权责任的归责原则和构成要件。第四章结合具体案例,对《侵权责任法》第36条第2款和第3款相关条款的具体适用情况进行分类并深入分析,给出具体化建议。第五章给出网络交易平台提供商在专利侵权纠纷中相关法律适用的几点思路和立法建议。
[Abstract]:Since the 1990s, Internet technology has developed rapidly, and Internet transactions based on Internet technology are booming. With the expansion of the scale of online transactions, the number of commodities traded has increased sharply, and the infringement of intellectual property rights has become more and more, which has caused a great impact and impact on the legal rights of the obligee and the normal operation order of the market. In recent years, online trading platforms receive and handle a large number of intellectual property disputes every year. Compared with copyright and trademark, patent right has higher technical requirements on judgment subject in infringement judgment, and there are no specific legal provisions for patent infringement in network transaction. At the same time, the court on the network trading platform providers of tort liability division and judgment also has certain differences. For these reasons, the legal status, rights and obligations of Internet trading platform providers in related patent infringement disputes are not clear. It also faces many difficulties in handling patent infringement disputes, including: how to identify qualified and effective "notice" in practical operation, and how to deal with it after receiving "notice" to avoid joint and several liability, etc. In view of the above problems, the author combines the general situation of the network trading platform provider, according to the current situation of patent infringement on the network trading platform of our country in recent years, finds out the difficult problem that it faces in the patent infringement dispute. And to its tort liability imputation principle and the constitution element and so on carries on the analysis. This paper attempts to study the solutions of platform providers in patent infringement disputes based on empirical cases, and puts forward a solution to the patent infringement in network transactions. This paper mainly includes five chapters: the first chapter discusses the concept and types of network trading platform providers, focusing on the legal status and legal obligations of network trading platform providers. The second chapter combines macroscopic data and typical cases to find out the specific problems faced by network trading platform providers when patent infringement disputes occur in network transactions. The third chapter mainly combs the legal basis of judging the tort liability of the network trading platform provider in patent infringement, and emphatically studies the principle of liability and the constitutive requirements of its tort liability. The fourth chapter classifies and analyzes the specific application of the relevant provisions of Article 36 (2) and (3) of the Tort liability Law in combination with specific cases, and gives some concrete suggestions. The fifth chapter gives some ideas and legislative suggestions on the application of relevant laws in patent infringement disputes of network trading platform providers.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】