无权处分——理论实务总结与民法总则制订

发布时间：2018-04-30 05:07

本文选题：无权处分 + 负担行为　；参考：《东方法学》2016年06期

【摘要】：我国民法学界长期以来就无权处分和《合同法》第51条展开了激烈争论,形成了债权行为效力待定说、债权行为有效说以及处分行为效力待定说三种主要学说,至今仍未达成共识。在《物权法》颁布后,我国法院逐渐抛弃了债权行为效力待定说,并以《买卖合同司法解释》第3条为标志,正式采纳了处分行为效力待定说,并且以《物权法》第15条以及负担行为与处分行为的区分作为解释基础。由立法和司法组成的法律制度须满足现实需要,学说的优劣取决于解释力的强弱。从司法实践的情况来看,分离原则与处分行为效力待定说已经成为了新的通说,我国民法典制定应该反映学说与司法实践的最新态度。鉴于无权处分是贯穿私法领域的一般问题,我们应当以分离原则为指导思想,在民法总则中对无权处分作出规定。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the scholars of civil law in our country have launched a fierce debate on disposition without power and Article 51 of the contract Law, which has formed three main theories: the validity of creditor's rights, the validity of creditor's rights and the validity of disposition. No consensus has yet been reached. After the promulgation of the Real right Law, the courts of our country have gradually abandoned the theory of the validity of creditor's rights to be determined, and taking Article 3 of the contract of sale and purchase as the symbol, formally adopted the theory of the effect of disposition behavior to be determined. The interpretation is based on Article 15 of the Real right Law and the distinction between the burden act and the punishment act. The legal system composed of legislation and judicature must meet the practical needs, and the merits and demerits of the doctrine depend on the strength of interpretation. From the point of view of judicial practice, the principle of separation and the pending theory of the effect of disciplinary action have become a new general theory, and the formulation of civil code of our country should reflect the latest attitude of doctrine and judicial practice. In view of the fact that unauthorized disposition is a general problem running through the field of private law, we should take the principle of separation as the guiding ideology and make provisions on unauthorized disposition in the general principles of civil law.
【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;中山大学立法研究中心;
【基金】：中山大学“中国立法研究大平台”项目研究成果
【分类号】：D923.2;D923.6

【相似文献】