续写作品的法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 14:19

本文选题：续写作品 + 独创性　；参考：《湘潭大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：续写指的是在先前的创作铺垫下进行的再发展行为,续写作品是原作的一种延伸与发展,他们之间的鸿沟,是不能轻易跨越的,因而使两者存在相对的独立性。续写作品是在原著的基础上进行创新,来源于原作,又高于原作。续写作品的特征主要体现在续写作品对原作品的依附性、续写作品的独创性、续写作品的反作用性以及续写作品的利益性上。续写作品可能侵犯原著作权人的演绎权。续写行为和演绎行为有很大的区别,主要是其依附性的强弱不同,续写行为的发挥空间更大。演绎权受到国内相关条款的保护,享受和原著同等的产权,但由于特性的不同,续写行为和演绎行为并不属于同一范畴。续写作品可能侵犯原著作权人的保护作品完整权,部分写者为了达到个人的某种目的不负责任的粗制滥造续写作品,这无疑是对原作品的完整性的破坏,同时也影响了原作者的声誉,扭曲了原作者所阐述的价值观和写作初衷。此外,对作品进行正面性的修改或增减,也应当认定是侵犯作品完整权的行为。从商业角度考虑,往往只有一些经典的文学作品才有续写的价值,这些作品占据了续写作品中的大多数,由于续写作品有原文作参照,因此改动强度低,成本较低以及收益较高,具有巨大的潜在经济价值。续写者对作品的完成是以原作品的存在为前提的,读者在读的时候总会联想起原作的情节,从而与续作进行对接,由于其依赖性,导致读者在阅读时容易造成弄混,从而进行购买或付费阅读,这样就会引起续写作品和原创之间发生冲突。一直以来,续写文学作品和续拍影视作品是否合法,是否侵犯原作品权利人的著作权都是学者和法律人士争议的焦点。但是,续写作品并没有纳入我国《著作权法》的保护范畴,因此,原著权利人也只能承受续写给其带来的影响。为了繁荣和促进文化产业的发展,满足网络作家的续写自由和网络作品爱好者的阅读权利,我们必须尽快制定出相关规定,解决著作权中出现的这种混乱局面。我国的著作权法中,无法找到与续写作品有关的概念,所以没有办法从已有的著作权保护制度中找到直接的、比较适合的解决方案来解决续写作品这一问题。但是,由于续写作品出现的问题日益严重,用何种法律制度来解决续写作品与原作品之间的冲突,理论界也给出了不同的意见。虽然续写行为既不属于我国法律中规定的著作人身权.II侵权行为,也不属于财产权侵权行为。但是,该行为的的确使原作者的权益受到侵犯。而原作品作者享有著作权,以此权利原作品作者能对作品进行控制以及利用,这是作品作者的专有权利。因此,在《著作权法》中建立控制续写行为的专有权利是有必要的,需要对续写作品的权利给予一定程度的限制,构建续写者与原作者利益平衡的协调机制,维护社会公众利益是解决以上矛盾和冲突的最佳选择。
[Abstract]:The continuation refers to the redevelopment behavior carried out under the foundation of the previous creation. The continuation of the work is an extension and development of the original work. The gap between them can not be easily crossed, so that there is a relative independence between the two. The continuation of the work is based on the original innovation, from the original, but also higher than the original. The characteristics of the continued works are mainly reflected in the dependence of the sequel works on the original works, the originality of the continuation works, the reaction of the continuation works and the interests of the continued works. The continuation of the work may infringe upon the original copyright owner's deductive right. There are great differences between the sequel behavior and the deductive behavior, mainly because the dependence of the behavior is different, and the play space of the sequel behavior is greater. The deductive right is protected by the relevant articles in China and enjoys the same property rights as the original works, but due to the differences of characteristics, the continuation and deductive behavior do not belong to the same category. The continuation of a work may infringe upon the original copyright owner's right to protect the integrity of the work, and some writers, in order to achieve a certain purpose of the individual, create a continuation of the work irresponsibly and indiscriminately. This undoubtedly undermines the integrity of the original work. At the same time, it also affects the reputation of the original author and distorts the original author's stated values and original intention of writing. In addition, the positive modification or addition or subtraction of the work should also be regarded as an infringement of the right to integrity of the work. From a commercial point of view, only classical literary works tend to have a continuation value. These works make up the majority of the sequels, and because they have the original text as a reference, they have low intensity of modification. Lower costs and higher returns have enormous potential economic value. The completion of the work by the sequencer is based on the existence of the original work. Readers always associate the plot of the original work with the sequel when they read it. As a result of its dependence, the reader is prone to confusion while reading. Buy or pay for reading, which creates a conflict between the sequel and the original. All along, whether it is legal to continue to write literary works and to continue to shoot films and TV works, and whether to infringe the copyright of the right holders of the original works are the focus of controversy between scholars and legal personages. However, the continuation of the works is not included in the protection category of copyright Law of China, so the owner of the original works can only bear the influence of the continuation of the works. In order to prosper and promote the development of cultural industry, to satisfy the freedom of network writers and the reading rights of network works lovers, we must make relevant regulations as soon as possible to solve the confusion in copyright. In the copyright law of our country, it is impossible to find the concept related to the continuation of the work, so there is no way to find a direct and more suitable solution from the existing copyright protection system to solve the problem of the continuation of the work. However, due to the increasingly serious problem of the continuation of the work, what kind of legal system to solve the conflict between the work and the original work, the theorists have also given different views. Although the continuation is neither the infringement of the personal rights of the works, nor the infringement of the property rights, which is stipulated in the law of our country. However, the act did infringe upon the rights and interests of the original author. The author of the original work enjoys copyright, which is the exclusive right of the author of the work to control and utilize the work. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the exclusive right to control the rewriting behavior in the copyright Law. It is necessary to restrict the right to renew the work to a certain extent, and to construct the coordination mechanism of balancing the interests of the sequencer and the original author. Safeguarding the public interest is the best choice to solve the above conflicts.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】