诱空虚假陈述侵权责任之因果关系

发布时间：2018-05-04 23:09

本文选题：诱空虚假陈述 + 事实因果关系　；参考：《法商研究》2016年06期

【摘要】：我国有关证券虚假陈述民事责任法律规范只规定了诱多虚假陈述因果关系的认定规则,对诱空虚假陈述的因果关系却未提及。鉴于"必然因果关系说"和"相当因果关系说"存在的缺陷,用我国现行因果关系理论解决诱空虚假陈述因果关系的认定问题是行不通的。诱空虚假陈述之因果关系可以分为事实因果关系和法律因果关系。事实因果关系的认定可分两种情况:隐瞒型诱空虚假陈述可以采用重大性标准予以认定,其他型诱空虚假陈述则以欺诈市场理论为基础的信赖推定原则予以认定;法律因果关系则适用"直接后果说"和"合理预见说"进行认定。
[Abstract]:In our country, the legal norms of civil liability for false statements of securities only stipulate the rules for determining the causality of false statements, but the causality of the false statements is not mentioned. In view of the defects of the "inevitable causality" and the "equivalent causality theory", the causation of the false statements of the lure is solved by the current theory of causality in our country. The relationship between the causality of the false statement can be divided into factual causality and legal causality. The identification of factual causality can be divided into two cases: the concealment type false statement can be identified by the standard of importance, and the other type of vacant false statement is based on fraudulent market theory. According to presumption principle, the law of causality is applicable to "direct consequence theory" and "reasonable foresight theory".

【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(13FFX008)
【分类号】：D922.287;D923

【相似文献】