论我国专利间接侵权制度的完善
发布时间:2018-05-05 06:30
本文选题:专利间接侵权 + 诱导侵权 ; 参考:《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:专利间接侵权将非专利产品归入到专利权保护客体中,增强对专利权人保护的同时,在一定程度上会产生垄断行为,损害社会公众群体的权益。因而自其诞生之日起就引起了对专利权人利益保护和对公共利益保护之间的博弈。我国目前尚缺乏对专利间接侵权的统一定论。2016年3月,最高法以司法解释的形式规定了对专利间接侵权的处理意见,引起了我国法学界的高度关注。虽然该解释对专利间接侵权的行为类型、构成要件、责任承担等进行了规定,但是该解释只是给专利间接侵权制度提供了一个框架,并不能解决该制度在立法上的空白,并且在司法实践中没有设计相应的具体保障措施。本文在我国现有法律的基础上,结合国内司法实践中的案例,借鉴域外相关法律规定,对专利间接侵权进行了详细的分析,提出从行为对象、行为方式、行为人主观要件上规范专利间接侵权行为的构成要件,为我国设立单独的条款提供了参考。本文还从规范责任承担、设立专业审理法院、给予不同行业间保护力度等方面,提出了完善该制度的若干保障措施。
[Abstract]:Indirect patent infringement classifies non-patented products into the object of patent protection, strengthens the protection of patentee, at the same time, it will produce monopoly behavior to a certain extent and damage the rights and interests of public groups. Therefore, the game between the protection of the patentee's interests and the protection of the public interests has arisen since its birth. At present, there is no unified conclusion on indirect patent infringement in China. In March 2016, the Supreme Law stipulated the opinions on the treatment of indirect patent infringement in the form of judicial interpretation, which has aroused great concern in the field of law in our country. Although the interpretation of indirect patent infringement of the types of acts, elements, liability and other provisions, but the interpretation of indirect patent infringement system to provide a framework, can not solve the legislative gaps in the system. And in judicial practice, there is no corresponding specific protection measures. On the basis of the existing laws of our country, combined with the cases in the domestic judicial practice, this paper makes a detailed analysis of the indirect infringement of patent by referring to the relevant laws and regulations outside the country, and puts forward the object of the act, the mode of the act, The subjective elements of the perpetrator regulate the constitution of indirect patent infringement, which provides a reference for the establishment of separate articles in our country. This paper also puts forward some safeguard measures to perfect the system from the aspects of standardizing the responsibility, setting up the specialized trial court and giving the strength of protection among different industries.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许浩明;李捷;;论我国专利间接侵权制度的缺位与立法完善[J];河南工业大学学报(社会科学版);2016年01期
2 张玲;纪璐;;美国专利侵权惩罚性赔偿制度及其启示[J];法学杂志;2013年02期
3 张玲;;论专利侵权赔偿损失的归责原则[J];中国法学;2012年02期
4 张通;刘筠筠;;我国专利间接侵权规则审视与思考[J];中国发明与专利;2012年02期
5 杨萌;郑志柱;;专利间接侵权与专利侵权判定原则[J];知识产权;2011年04期
6 熊文聪;;被误读的专利间接侵权规则——以美国法的变迁为线索[J];东方法学;2011年01期
7 袁真富;;基于侵权抗辩之专利默示许可探究[J];法学;2010年12期
8 李昌玉;;对我国专利间接侵权法律制度的反思[J];长江大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
9 王凌红;;我国专利间接侵权制度的立法方向——以利益平衡为视点求解《专利法》第三次修改的未决立法课题[J];电子知识产权;2009年06期
10 朱丹;;关于建立我国专利间接侵权制度的思考[J];人民司法;2009年01期
,本文编号:1846635
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1846635.html