论《民法总则》中个人隐私与信息的“二元制”保护及请求权基础

发布时间：2018-05-06 04:15

本文选题：隐私 + 隐私权　；参考：《浙江工商大学学报》2017年03期

【摘要】：我国《民法总则》(第110条及第111条)明显地是将隐私与信息分别加以保护的,但理论和实践中的问题是:在这种二元保护模式中,隐私与信息能否明确地加以区分?从国外的立法例看,多采取信息与隐私的"一元制"保护模式,即不区分信息与隐私,原因就是信息与隐私难以区分。文章赞成我国民法总则的"二元制"保护模式,并且认为,隐私与信息是可以区分的,应用"三分法"来区分隐私与信息,即分为纯粹的个人隐私、隐私性信息、纯粹的个人信息。从对隐私和信息保护的请求权基础上看,受到损害的主体之请求权基础在于《民法总则》的第八章"民事责任"、《侵权责任法》及《网络安全法》等特别法。《民法总则》第109-111条虽然规定了对隐私权和信息权的保护,但却没有
[Abstract]:The general rule of the civil law of China (110th and 111) is obviously protecting privacy and information respectively, but the problem in theory and practice is: can privacy and information be clearly differentiated in this two yuan protection mode? From foreign legislation, the "one dollar" protection mode of information and privacy is to be adopted, that is, to distinguish information from information. And privacy, the reason is that information and privacy are difficult to distinguish. The article is in favor of the "two yuan" protection model of the general principles of civil law in our country, and thinks that privacy and information can be distinguished, and the use of "three points" to distinguish privacy and information, which is divided into pure personal privacy, privacy information, pure personal information. From the protection of privacy and information, please On the basis of power seeking, the right of request for the subject of damage is based on the eighth chapter "civil liability", "tort liability law" and "network safety law". "The general principles of civil law," article 109-111 stipulates the protection of the right to privacy and the right to information, but it does not

【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】