论间接占有制度

发布时间：2018-05-07 05:18

本文选题：间接占有 + 功能　；参考：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：占有制度由来已久,在物权法中占据十分重要的地位。随着社会经济的发展、科学技术不断进步,大众的思想也在不断进步,占有从原始的、简单的事实上的支配关系发展为观念上的支配关系,占有制度被抽象化。间接占有制度应运而生,在法律关系中有了很大的发展空间。占有制度起源于罗马法与日耳曼法,间接占有制度在《德国民法典》中予以确立。我国物权法对于占有制度的规定只寥寥几条,对间接占有制度尚未作出明确规定,而且我国法学学者对于间接占有制度的存废问题存在争议,没有达成一致的看法。因此,笔者认为对于间接占有制度的深入研究不可或缺。本文运用比较法研究、历史研究等方法对间接占有制度进行深入的探讨,希望可以论证间接占有制度确有其他制度无法替代的作用和功能。本文的第一部分运用比较法的方法说明间接占有制度的起源与不同国家的立法例,展现出不同国家对间接占有制度的不同观点。第二部分谈论占有的性质与间接占有的性质与功能,并且描述学界对于间接占有制度的争论。第三部分研究间接占有与相关物权制度,例如与物权法、时效取得等的关系。第四部分研究对间接占有制度的反思,并在民法中构建此制度。本文通过梳理表明间接占有制度在物权法中的功能是客观存在的,并非可有可无的,在取得时效、占有改定等方面具有不可或缺的价值,并且对间接占有人的保护也是必不可少的。因此,笔者认为间接占有制度在我国物权法中有很大的发展空间。
[Abstract]:Possession system has a long history and occupies a very important position in the property law. With the development of social economy and the progress of science and technology, the thought of the masses is also progressing constantly. The possession system is abstracted from the primitive and simple de facto dominating relationship to the conceptual dominating relation. Indirect possession system emerged as the times require, in the legal relationship has a great space for development. Possession system originated from Roman law and Germanic law, and indirect possession system was established in the German Civil Code. There are only a few provisions on the possession system in the property law of our country, but no clear provisions have been made on the indirect possession system. Moreover, there is no consensus among Chinese legal scholars on the existence or abolition of the indirect possession system. Therefore, the author believes that the study of indirect possession system is indispensable. This paper uses the methods of comparative study and historical study to probe into the indirect possession system, hoping to prove that the indirect possession system has some functions and functions which cannot be replaced by other systems. The first part of this paper uses the method of comparative law to explain the origin of indirect possession system and the legislative examples of different countries, showing the different views of different countries on indirect possession system. The second part discusses the nature of possession and the nature and function of indirect possession. The third part studies the relationship between indirect possession and relevant real right system, such as property law, prescription acquisition and so on. The fourth part studies the reflection of indirect possession system and constructs it in civil law. This paper shows that the function of the indirect possession system in the property law is objective and not dispensable, and has an indispensable value in the aspects of the prescription of acquisition, the modification of possession and so on. And the protection of indirect occupants is also essential. Therefore, the author thinks that the system of indirect possession has great space for development in the property law of our country.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】