当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

IPTV著作权侵权问题研究

发布时间:2018-05-09 13:02

  本文选题:IPTV + 信息网络传播权 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:电信运营商网络、有线电视网络和计算机互联网这三种原本相互独立的网络如今三网融合,产生了新事物——IPTV网络电视,其通常以电视机为接收信息的终端,以互联网为传输介质,为用户提供娱乐视听的业务。IPTV是一种交互式通过网络传输节目的传播技术,在实践中产生了不少纠纷,学者发表的观点也有很多意见分歧。本文从IPTV本身的技术特征出发,对所涉及的广播权和信息网络传播权进行探讨,结合一些相互矛盾的案例判决,展开论述。全文共分为三章,外加结论,约二万五千多字。第一章:IPTV引发的相关著作权侵权问题争议。通过引用两个有着截然不同的认定和判决的相似案例,来说明通过网络传播电视节目来实现一系列功能的IPTV,其所实现的功能在法律上适用权利认定是存在一定争议的。由于IPTV是一个技术产物,很多人只是从使用者的角度了解其带给人们的一些功能,但是对其运营模式、技术概念、应用特点及发展现状不是很了解,笔者从内剖析,引出其所产生的相关的著作权侵权问题,正是这样与我们生活娱乐息息相关的IPTV,点出对其引发的侵权问题研究更具有意义和价值。第二章:IPTV功能的法律定性。当网络时代的到来,传统版权已经不适应新时代产生的版权侵权问题的有效解决,著作权与网络的结合是历史不可避免的自然演进规则。IPTV的直播、回看功能主要混淆了著作权中的广播权和信息网络传播权,文中论述了广播权和信息网络传播权的区别,和在IPTV不同的服务功能的适用上的不同。第三章:IPTV业务中著作权侵权责任的承担。概述IPTV业务侵权行为的主体,侵权行为的归责原则,侵权行为的法律责任,同时通过经典的IPTV侵权案例,对IPTV业务中具体侵权行为的责任进行了论述介绍,其中围绕电信在IPTV业务中承担的角色,是否与百视通共同承担侵权责任展开分析,并提出了笔者的看法。结论:简要阐述IPTV技术和运营模式未来发展趋势,对其所适用的法律也应逐步进步和完善,在平衡利益之外,在认可基础的条件下,制定符合商业规则的法律,使其具有现实操作对于IPTV网络服务提供者来说仅获得广播权是不够的,还要取得点播、回看作品的“信息网络传播权”。
[Abstract]:The telecommunication operator network, cable television network and computer Internet, which were originally independent of each other, are now converging with each other, resulting in a new phenomenon IPTV network television, which usually uses television as the terminal for receiving information. IPTV, which takes the Internet as the transmission medium, provides entertainment for users. IPTV is a kind of interactive transmission technology of programs over the network. In practice, there have been a lot of disputes, and many opinions have been expressed by scholars. Based on the technical characteristics of IPTV, this paper discusses the broadcast right and information network transmission right, and discusses some contradictory cases. The full text is divided into three chapters, plus conclusions, about 25000 words. Chapter one: the controversy of copyright infringement caused by IPTV. By quoting two similar cases which have different cognizance and judgment, this paper explains that IPTV, which realizes a series of functions by means of network communication TV program, has some disputes on the legal application of IPTV. Because IPTV is a technology product, many people only understand some functions it brings to people from the point of view of users, but it is not very clear about its operation mode, technical concept, application characteristics and development status. It is the IPTV which is closely related to our life and entertainment. It is more meaningful and valuable to point out the infringement problem caused by IPTV. Chapter two: legal characterization of IPTV function. With the advent of the network age, the traditional copyright has not been adapted to the effective solution of the copyright infringement problem produced in the new era. The combination of copyright and network is the inevitable natural evolution rule of history. IPTV is broadcast live. The function of looking back mainly confuses the broadcast right and the information network transmission right in the copyright. This paper discusses the difference between the broadcast right and the information network transmission right, and the difference in the application of the different service functions of IPTV. Chapter three: the liability of copyright infringement in IPTV business. This paper summarizes the main body of IPTV business tort, the principle of tort liability, and the legal liability of tort. At the same time, through the classic IPTV tort case, the author introduces the specific tort liability in IPTV business. This paper analyzes the role of telecom in IPTV business and whether it bears tort liability with Blockcom, and puts forward the author's opinion. Conclusion: the development trend of IPTV technology and operation mode in the future should be briefly described, and the applicable law should be improved step by step. In addition to balancing interests and under the condition of recognition foundation, the law should be formulated in accordance with commercial rules. It is not enough for the IPTV network service provider to obtain broadcasting right only, but also to obtain the on-demand broadcasting, and to look back at the "right of information network dissemination" of the works.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.41

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 ;关于反对著作权侵权的声明[J];上海市政法管理干部学院学报;2001年04期

2 戴绍业;;互联网著作权侵权案件管辖问题浅析[J];福建法学;2001年03期

3 王素娟;对目前网络著作权侵权案件的法律分析[J];法律适用(国家法官学院学报);2002年07期

4 王云丽,黄月明;试论认定著作权侵权行为的归责原则[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2003年04期

5 高之;对“中国期刊数据库”著作权侵权案的法律评析[J];软件世界;2003年07期

6 段炼;网络传播中的著作权侵权行为分析[J];传媒观察;2003年05期

7 李毅鸿;音乐著作权侵权的认定问题研究[J];商场现代化;2005年01期

8 孟U,

本文编号:1866113


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1866113.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户92f85***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com