人工智能生成内容的著作权认定

发布时间：2018-05-19 16:38

本文选题：人工智能 + 人工智能生成内容　；参考：《知识产权》2017年03期

【摘要】：人工智能在新闻和视觉艺术领域参与创作活动的现象虽然在如今已成常态,但如何认定由此生成内容的可版权性及其权利归属,在法律上却并未形成统一意见。作为非自然人和法人的人工智能首次成为内容来源后,如果将该内容认定为受著作权法保护的作品,必将冲击传统著作权的客体认定标准和权利归属原则,引发权利变动和侵权认定规则的全面混乱。作为激励"理性人"创作和传播的制度工具,著作权法无法脱离从移植自有体物财产权的制度体系和主客体不得互换的基本私法原理,因而围绕创作者和投资者构建的制度设计不应也无法因人工智能而被颠覆。作为遵循人工智能软件设计者意志创作的产物,人工智能生成内容的结果不但仍可由独创性判定标准来认定,权利归属也应借鉴早已存在且运作成熟的法人作品制度安排,将人工智能的所有者视为著作权人。
[Abstract]:Although the phenomenon of artificial intelligence participating in creative activities in the field of news and visual arts has become the norm nowadays, there is no unified opinion on how to determine the copyright of the resulting content and its right attribution. As a non-natural person and legal person, artificial intelligence has become the content source for the first time. If the content is regarded as a work protected by copyright law, it will certainly impact on the standard of object recognition and the principle of ownership of rights of traditional copyright. Causes the right change and the infringement confirmation rule the complete confusion. As an institutional tool to encourage the creation and dissemination of "rational people", copyright law cannot be divorced from the institutional system of transplanting property rights to its own objects and the basic private law principle that subject and object cannot be interchangeable. So the institutions built around creators and investors should not and cannot be subverted by artificial intelligence. As a result of the will creation of artificial intelligence software designer, the result of the content generated by artificial intelligence can still be determined by the criterion of originality, and the ownership of rights should also draw lessons from the institutional arrangement of legal person's works, which already exist and operate mature. The owner of artificial intelligence is regarded as the copyright owner.
【作者单位】：华中科技大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部法治与法学理论研究项目“3D打印行为的著作权规制研究”(14SFB30027)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】