涉外网络著作权侵权之管辖问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-23 08:02

本文选题：涉外网络著作权侵权 + 管辖规则　；参考：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：网络技术的发展给人们的生活带来了巨大的变革,小到日常的衣食住行,大到社会各领域的发展,网络的身影随处可见。但在提供便利的同时,网络也给我国的传统法律制度带来了挑战,其中就包括涉外网络著作权侵权案件的管辖权问题。网络空间的虚拟性、全球性和无边界性等特点,使得网络著作权侵权管辖权表现出了与传统著作权侵权不同的法律特征,从而对我国现行的管辖规则产生了巨大的冲击。本文共分为四个部分,第一部分引入典型案例“中国大百科全书出版社诉苹果公司侵犯著作权案”,介绍了基本案情,并指出案例的争议焦点:我国法院行使管辖权的法律依据是否正确和传统侵权的管辖规则能否适用于本案。第二部分是对案件争议焦点的分析,介绍了处理传统侵权案件的管辖原则,网络著作权侵权的特点以及涉外网络著作权侵权对传统管辖原则的冲击。并对美国、德国、法国等国在处理涉外网络著作权侵权案件时的立法实践作了介绍和总结,对其利弊进行分析,着重说明了美国的立法实践对我国的借鉴意义。第三部分是本案的分析与结论,在前文分析和总结的基础上,对案例进行了分析,得出我国虽然能够取得本案的管辖权,但管辖依据上却存在瑕疵。第四部分对构建我国涉外网络著作权侵权案件管辖制度提出建议,即将原告住所地作为管辖依据,并引进不方便法院原则对原告诉权进行限制,同时借鉴美国的“指定目标检验标准”,以期早日完善我国的网络著作权侵权管辖制度。
[Abstract]:The development of network technology has brought great changes to people's life, from daily food, clothing, housing and transportation, to the development of various fields of society, the network can be seen everywhere. But at the same time, the network also brings challenges to the traditional legal system of our country, including the jurisdiction of the foreign network copyright infringement cases. The characteristics of cyberspace, such as fictitious, global and boundless, make the jurisdiction of network copyright infringement show different legal characteristics from the traditional copyright infringement, which has a great impact on the current jurisdiction rules of our country. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces a typical case, China Encyclopedia Publishing House v. Apple Corporation infringement of copyright, and introduces the basic facts of the case. It also points out that the dispute focus of the case is whether the legal basis for the exercise of jurisdiction by Chinese courts is correct or not and whether the jurisdiction rules of traditional tort can be applied to the case. The second part is the analysis of the focus of the case dispute, introduces the jurisdiction principle of dealing with the traditional infringement cases, the characteristics of network copyright infringement and the impact of foreign network copyright infringement on the traditional jurisdiction principle. It also introduces and summarizes the legislative practice of the United States, Germany, France and other countries in dealing with foreign network copyright infringement cases, analyzes its advantages and disadvantages, and emphatically explains the reference significance of American legislative practice to our country. The third part is the analysis and conclusion of the case, on the basis of the previous analysis and summary, the case is analyzed, and it is concluded that although our country can obtain the jurisdiction of the case, the jurisdictional basis is flawed. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions to construct the jurisdiction system of foreign network copyright infringement cases in our country, that is, the plaintiff's domicile is the basis of jurisdiction, and the principle of inconvenient court is introduced to restrict the plaintiff's right of action. At the same time, reference is made to the designated target test standard in order to improve the jurisdiction system of network copyright infringement in our country as soon as possible.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923;D923.41

【相似文献】