民法总则错误制度构造论

发布时间：2018-05-23 13:52

本文选题：民法总则 + 错误制度　；参考：《法商研究》2016年04期

【摘要】：就我国民法总则错误制度之构造而言,现有民法总则草案有一元模式与二元模式之分,这两种模式分别反映了错误制度在民法立法论上的罗马—法国法传统与德国法传统。民法总则是潘得克吞体系的产物,二元模式符合这一体系下制度构造之基本逻辑。从德国法到中国法,二元模式经百年来学理、判例改造,形成稳定的通说和大量司法实践经验,并在网络时代展现出全新的解释力。在形式上,应从客观存在的动机错误与表示错误之分出发构造错误制度。在实质上,应在承认人的有限理性之基础上赋予表意人撤销自由,并通过不以过错为条件的信赖赔偿责任实现交易安全之保障。二元模式的错误制度构造符合民法总则之利益格局,体系化考量则在民法总则制度构造论中扮演着重要角色。
[Abstract]:In terms of the construction of the erroneous system of the general principles of civil law in our country, the draft of the present draft of the general principles of civil law is divided into two modes: the unitary model and the dualistic model, which respectively reflect the Roman-French legal tradition and the German legal tradition of the erroneous system in the theory of civil law legislation. The general principles of civil law are the product of Pandecton system, and the dualistic model accords with the basic logic of institutional structure under this system. From the German law to the Chinese law, the dualistic model has formed a stable general theory and a great deal of judicial practice experience through the transformation of academic theory and jurisprudence in the past hundred years, and has displayed a new explanatory power in the network age. In form, a wrong system should be constructed from the difference between objective errors of motivation and errors of representation. In essence, on the basis of acknowledging the limited rationality of human beings, we should give the ideographers the freedom to revoke, and realize the security of transaction through the trust liability without fault as the condition. The erroneous institutional structure of dualistic mode accords with the benefit pattern of the general principles of civil law, and systematization plays an important role in the theory of system construction of the general principles of civil law.
【作者单位】：苏州大学王健法学院;江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD143) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD) 中华全国律师协会“2016年度全国律协研究课题”(2016XB014)
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】