论衡平原则在我国《消费者权益保护法》中的演进
发布时间:2018-06-03 18:06
本文选题:衡平原则 + 《消费者权益保护法》 ; 参考:《暨南大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:衡平原则起源于哲学中的衡平思想,最显著的体现是在英国的衡平法中。衡平原则是法律完善的内在逻辑,创设衡平权利和开辟新的救济方法则是衡平原则完善法律的两大途径。衡平原则的内在要求是追求公平与公正,促进和谐有序的法治。消费者权益保护法律体系的形成与演进过程正是衡平原则演进过程的具体体现。随着消费者权益保护工作的不断发展,衡平原则在法律层面明确消费者权益的同时,还从法律救济上对消费者权益进行了全方位的保护。我国首部《消费者权益保护法》出台于1993年,施行20年后于2013年迎来了首次大修,新法相较于旧法进行了必要的完善,其中也体现了衡平原则。在未来,为进一步完善和促进我国《消费者权益保护法》的发展,立法者可以从追求权利的衡平与完善救济方法两个方面努力,实现消费者权益保护法律体系不断进行自我调整,以满足现实需要。
[Abstract]:The principle of equalization originates from the thought of equalization in philosophy, the most notable embodiment of which is in English equity. The principle of equalization is the internal logic of the perfection of law, and the creation of equal rights and the opening of new remedies are the two main ways to perfect the law. The inherent requirement of the principle of equality is to pursue fairness and justice and to promote the harmonious and orderly rule of law. The formation and evolution of the legal system of consumer rights and interests protection is the concrete embodiment of the evolutional process of the principle of equalization. With the continuous development of the protection of consumers' rights and interests, the principle of equalization not only clarifies the rights and interests of consumers at the legal level, but also protects the rights and interests of consumers in all directions from the aspect of legal relief. The first "Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law" in China was issued in 1993, and the first overhaul was introduced in 2013 after 20 years of implementation. The new law is necessary to improve compared with the old law, and it also embodies the principle of balance between the new law and the old one. In the future, in order to further improve and promote the development of our country's Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law, legislators can strive to balance their rights and improve relief methods. To realize the legal system of consumer rights and interests protection constantly self-adjustment to meet the actual needs.
【学位授予单位】:暨南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.8
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 宋征,胡明;从王海打假案看知假买假者是否消费者——法解释学意义上的分析[J];当代法学;2003年01期
2 梁慧星;消费者运动与消费者权利[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1991年05期
3 武飞;;衡平司法与和谐社会建设[J];法律方法;2008年00期
4 郝铁川;权利冲突:一个不成为问题的问题[J];法学;2004年09期
5 陈锋;;从伦理衡平到法律衡平——我国衡平司法传统的意义、困境与出路[J];法学;2006年08期
6 苏号朋;;《消费者权益保护法》修改中若干重大问题研究[J];西部法学评论;2013年02期
7 周明勇;;论司法衡平传统及当代的价值[J];朝阳法律评论;2012年02期
8 李向阳;闫逢柱;;英国消费者权益保护的新举措及启示[J];中国科技投资;2013年11期
9 李芳;英国衡平法初探[J];河北法学;2000年01期
10 朱慧;;美国消费者权益保护刍论[J];经济研究导刊;2008年10期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 ;[N];法制日报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李朋洲;西方衡平思想的产生、发展与制度化过程[D];上海师范大学;2014年
,本文编号:1973702
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1973702.html