专利权保护网之漏洞及其弥补手段研究

发布时间：2018-06-06 00:01

本文选题：专利保护网 + 漏洞　；参考：《现代法学》2016年02期

【摘要】：与商标、版权不同,中国专利权保护网至今仍然存在较大的漏洞。导致漏洞的原因主要在于对专利侵权行为行政执法权与刑事责任的缺失。一些理论认为侵害商标、版权等行为会对消费者造成损害,这涉及到社会公共利益问题,所以纳入刑法保护范围、动用秩序行政的手段予以制裁是可以接受的;专利作为私人财产权,其侵害行为应当归于民事纠纷范畴,权利人遭遇侵害时只能自行通过民事诉讼的方式进行救济,侵权人不应承担刑事责任,国家也不能动用秩序行政的方式进行保护。这可以从创新驱动发展下专利保护面临的严峻现实、导致专利保护严峻现实的理论误解、专利民事司法救济在构建创新秩序方面的局限性来展开论述。强化并规范专利行政执法,及时将专利侵权行为纳入刑法保护范围,是弥补专利权保护网上巨大漏洞的两个重要手段。在建设创新型国家的大背景下,不仅是正当的,而且是迫切的。
[Abstract]:Different from trademarks and copyrights, China patent protection network still has a large loophole. The main reason for the loophole lies in the lack of administrative law enforcement right and criminal responsibility for patent infringement. Some theories believe that infringement of trademark, copyright and other acts will cause harm to consumers, which is related to the social and public interests, so it is acceptable to bring them into the scope of criminal law protection and use the administrative means of order to punish them; As a private property right, the infringement of a patent should be classified as a civil dispute. The obligee can only remedy himself by way of civil action when being infringed, and the infringer should not bear criminal responsibility. The state also cannot use the order administration way to carry on the protection. This can be discussed from the severe reality of patent protection under innovation-driven development, which leads to the theoretical misunderstanding of the grim reality of patent protection, and the limitation of patent civil judicial relief in the construction of innovation order. Strengthening and standardizing patent administrative law enforcement and bringing patent infringement into the scope of criminal law protection in time are two important means to make up the huge loophole of patent protection network. In the context of building an innovative country, it is not only legitimate, but urgent.
【作者单位】：国家知识产权局知识产权发展研究中心;
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】