论新技术环境下“转换性使用”理论的发展

发布时间：2018-06-06 16:13

本文选题：转换性使用 + 合理使用　；参考：《知识产权》2017年08期

【摘要】："转换性使用"理论是美国法官在司法实践中创立并用于判断合理使用的一个要素。随着相关司法判例的累积,各类新型使用行为层出不穷,"转换性使用"在合理使用中的地位日益突出,其内涵也不断拓展。从当前的司法实践来看,"转换性使用"在合理使用中的重要性已逐渐超越"对作品潜在市场的影响"要素,成为合理使用判断的主导要素。法院对"转换性使用"的界定应以相关作品领域的"普通理性公众"为标准,判断重心应从"内容性转换"向"目的性转换"转移。我国的司法实务也突显了对"转换性使用"理论的需求,然而,法院突破现行著作权法对限制与例外的封闭式规定以适用"转换性适用"理论仅是权益之计,最佳做法是值此著作权修法之际,对"转换性使用"理论进行本土化改造。
[Abstract]:The theory of "transformative use" is an important element that American judges have established in judicial practice and used to judge reasonable use. With the accumulation of relevant judicial precedents, various kinds of new use behaviors emerge endlessly. The status of "transformational use" in rational use is becoming increasingly prominent, and its connotation is constantly expanding. From the current judicial practice, the importance of "transformational use" in rational use has gradually exceeded the "influence on the potential market of works" and become the dominant factor of rational use judgment. The court's definition of "transformative use" should be based on the standard of "ordinary rational public" in the field of relevant works, and the focus of judgment should be shifted from "content conversion" to "purposeful transformation". The judicial practice of our country also highlights the demand for the theory of "transformational use". However, it is only a measure of rights and interests for the courts to break through the closed provisions of the current copyright law on restrictions and exceptions to apply the theory of "transformational application". The best practice is to localize the theory of "transformative use" at the time of copyright amendment.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：2014年度国家社科基金重大项目《互联网领域知识产权重大立法问题研究》(批准号:14ZDC020)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D971.2;DD913

【相似文献】