论有因行为与无因行为的区分

发布时间：2018-06-08 06:19

本文选题：原因 + 有因行为　；参考：《郑州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：以一个法律行为是否与其内在的原因相互依存作为判定依据,将法律行为划分成有因行为与无因行为两类。有因法律行为与无因法律行为的区分对于民事法律关系的判断,市场交易费用的降低,保障交易的安全稳定,市场经济水平的安全有序发展,发挥着十分关键的影响。但在现有的理论研究中,有因行为与无因行为二者行为应如何区分、体系应如何确定以及权利失衡的一方应如何救济等问题没有明确清楚的规定。本文由引言、正文、结论三大部分构成,在区分二者概念、内涵的基础上,分析内在二者内在含义的不同,对行为背后的“原因”进行了剖析,并对二者的类型进行了归纳,并提出了程序法中的不同要求。引言部分,笔者交代了目前有关法律行为制度、有因行为、无因行为的研究现状,阐释了本文之研究对象、研究方法及研究目的。正文第一部分探讨了有因行为、无因行为二者概念的分野。通过查阅法国、德国及我国的相关规定,对二者的概念进行了分析,结合法律行为理论中“原因”的含义,提出了有因行为与无因行为内在原因的不同。正文第二部分进一步分析了对二者进行区分的价值依据。通过三人社会理论的思考,分别提出了有因行为、无因行为的价值考量与利益平衡。笔者通过对二者进行比较,分析得出二者的区分,提出无因行为理论具有促进交易,增强财富流通性的价值,并为我们提供了一种具有固有价值的精湛的民法方法和民法思维。在此基础之上,正文第三部分对有因行为、无因行为的类型进行了总结归纳。正文最后一部分结合民事诉讼法提出了二者在程序法中的不同之处,通过典型案例的分析,对二者在证明对象、举证责任、证明标准等方面的不同进行了分析。结论部分是对全文的总结。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the interdependence of a legal act and its internal causes, the legal act is divided into two categories: the causative act and the non-cause act. Because of the distinction between legal acts and non-cause legal acts, the judgment of civil legal relations, the reduction of market transaction costs, the security and stability of transactions, and the safe and orderly development of the level of market economy play a very important role in the judgment of civil legal relations. However, in the existing theoretical research, there are no clear provisions on how to distinguish the behavior of cause behavior from non-cause behavior, how to determine the system and how to remedy the party whose rights are out of balance. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. On the basis of distinguishing the concepts and connotations of the two, the paper analyzes the difference of the intrinsic meanings of the two, analyzes the "reasons" behind the behavior, and sums up the types of the two. And put forward the different requirements in the procedural law. In the foreword, the author explains the current research situation of the legal act system, the cause act and the non-cause act, and explains the research object, the research method and the purpose of this paper. The first part of the text discusses the distinction between the concept of causative behavior and non-cause behavior. By referring to the relevant provisions of France, Germany and our country, this paper analyzes the concepts of the two concepts, and puts forward the difference between the internal reasons of the cause act and the non-cause act according to the meaning of "cause" in the theory of legal act. The second part of the text further analyzes the value basis of the distinction between the two. Through the consideration of the three-person social theory, this paper puts forward the value consideration and the benefit balance of the cause-based behavior and the non-cause behavior respectively. By comparing the two, the author points out that the theory of non-cause behavior has the value of promoting transaction and strengthening the circulation of wealth, and provides us with an exquisite method of civil law and thinking of civil law with inherent value. On this basis, the third part of the text summarizes the types of cause-based behavior and non-cause behavior. The last part of the text puts forward the difference between the two in the procedural law combined with the civil procedure law. Through the analysis of typical cases, this paper analyzes the differences in the object of proof, the burden of proof, the standard of proof and so on. The conclusion part is a summary of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D913

【参考文献】